Potrzebujesz pomocy eksperta ds. przetargów? Zobacz naszą usługę przygotowania przetargów
Przetargi

Purchase of presentation equipment for the exhibition „I want to play!“

Zamknięty

Termin składania ofert minął

Termin składania ofert w tym przetargu minął i nie przyjmujemy już zgłoszeń. Poniższe informacje zostały zachowane w celach informacyjnych.

Przeglądaj Aktywne Przetargi
Termin składania ofert
Przeterminowany
2 lutego 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Dostawy
Numer Referencyjny
305232
Wartość
€25,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Opublikowano
22 stycznia 2026
Kod CPV
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

22 stycznia 2026

Termin składania pytań

26 stycznia 2026

Termin składania ofert

2 lutego 2026

Otwarcie ofert

2 lutego 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

6 lutego 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budżet
€25,000
Czas trwania
2 miesiące
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Typ
Dostawy
62
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€104,435
Śr. liczba ofert
2.5
Konkurencja
Niska
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
311 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Hange hõlmab Teatri- ja Muusikamuuseumi ruumides (Müürivahe 12, Tallinn) avatava tegevusnäituse "Tahan mängida!" digilahenduste esitlusseadmete tarnet.
Składanie elektroniczne

Uruchom analizę ryzyka

Zidentyfikuj potencjalne ryzyka, niespójności i sygnały ostrzegawcze we wszystkich dokumentach przetargowych. Uzyskaj szczegółowy raport ryzyka z poziomami dotkliwości i zaleceniami dotyczącymi ich ograniczania.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Uzyskaj strategię wygrywania opartą na sztucznej inteligencji, dopasowaną do tego przetargu. Obejmuje wskaźnik prawdopodobieństwa wygranej, kluczowe szanse i wyzwania, zalecane obszary oferty, analizę pozycji konkurencyjnej oraz praktyczne rekomendacje maksymalizujące Twoje szanse.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

20 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (4)
Techniczne (7)
Finansowe (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the exclusion grounds and qualification criteria in the electronically completed ESPD.
--The bidder must confirm that the bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--The bid cost must be submitted using the document "305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The economic operator must not be subject to any exclusion grounds specified by the contracting authority.
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the exclusion grounds in the electronically completed ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must comply with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Conditional bids are prohibited.
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the qualification criteria in the electronically completed ESPD.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must meet the technical requirements and terms of reference for the purchase of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition.
--The bid must comply with the detailed technical specifications for presentation equipment (screens, media players, speakers), including desired models, as described in Annex 1.
--The bid must comply with the detailed technical specifications and functional requirements for digital exhibits (video content, activation mechanisms, presentation methods) as described in Annex 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for the purchase of presentation equipment (screens, players, speakers) for the "I want to play!" exhibition, in accordance with the specified specifications.
--The bid price is an evaluation criterion (40% weight).
--The bid cost must be submitted using the specific form.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

9 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

VastavustingimusedPDF
305232_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm that their tender proposal complies with all conditions set forth in the procurement documents, prohibiting conditional bids.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305232_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.6 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the procurement of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition, where price accounts for 40% and quality for 60%, covering compliance with the terms of reference, delivery time, warranty period, and response time.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305232_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

This explanatory document outlines the contracting authority's conditions regarding exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, which companies must declare in the electronically submitted European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Tehniline kirjeldus / lähteülesanneDOC
305232_Tahan mängida_Digilahenduste esitlusse... -- 53.0 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications and terms of reference for the procurement of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition.

LepinguprojektDOC
305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_... -- 44.5 KB

This draft contract outlines the purchase, delivery, and necessary maintenance of presentation equipment and technology for the "Tahan mängida!" exhibition, covering the period from March 6, 2026, to August 31, 2029.

Pakkumuse maksumuse vormXLS
305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_... -- 20.2 KB

This document is an offer cost form requiring bidders to provide a detailed price proposal for the purchase of exhibition presentation equipment, such as screens, players, and speakers, for the "I want to play!" exhibition, according to specified parameters.

TK lisa 1 Esitlusseadmete spetsifikatsioonXLS
Lisa 1 Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete spetsifi... -- 22.2 KB

This document details the technical specifications and desired models for presentation equipment, such as screens, media players, and speakers, required for the "I want to play!" exhibition.

TK lisa 2 digieksponaatide kirjeldusXLS
Lisa 2 Tahan mängida_digieksponaatide kirjeld... -- 76.9 KB

This document details the technical specifications and functional requirements for the digital exhibits of the "Tahan mängida!" exhibition, including video content, activation mechanisms, and presentation methods.

TK lisa 3 Näituse ruumiplaanZIP
Lisa 3 Näituse ruumiplaan.zip -- 19.7 MB

Brak dostępnego podsumowania dla tego dokumentu.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

62
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

Overall, this tender is well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but it contains critical inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration that require immediate clarification. These issues significantly impact clarity, fairness, and data consistency.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender appears generally compliant with national procurement regulations for a simplified procedure of this value. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and standard exclusion grounds are applied via ESPD. However, the significant internal inconsistencies could lead to legal challenges if not rectified.

•Potential legal risk due to contradictory evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration inconsistencies.
Przejrzystość60/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, and requirements are generally well-documented. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a severe contradiction in the weighting of evaluation criteria, where individual quality sub-criteria are each assigned 60% weight, while the overall quality weight is also 60%. This is a critical flaw that creates significant ambiguity.

•Contradictory weighting of evaluation criteria (e.g., multiple 60% quality weights for sub-criteria when overall quality is 60%).
•Ambiguity regarding 'desired models' in technical specifications; it should be clear if equivalents are accepted.
Kompletność70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. A comprehensive set of tender documents is attached. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the stated contract duration between the basic information (2 months) and the detailed requirements/draft contract (maintenance until 2029).

•Inconsistency in contract duration (2 months in basic info vs. maintenance until 2029 in requirements/draft contract).
Uczciwość65/100

The tender supports e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting equal access. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the contradictory evaluation criteria weighting severely undermines transparency and fairness in how bids will be assessed. The mention of 'desired models' in technical specifications could also potentially limit competition if not explicitly allowing for equivalent alternatives.

•Contradictory weighting of evaluation criteria creates an unfair and opaque bidding environment.
•'Desired models' in technical specifications could potentially tailor requirements to specific companies if equivalents are not clearly allowed.
Praktyczność65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. However, the significant inconsistency in the stated contract duration makes it practically challenging for bidders to accurately understand the full scope of the engagement and prepare a comprehensive, long-term price offer that includes maintenance services until 2029.

•Inconsistent contract duration makes it difficult for bidders to plan and price the full scope of work accurately.
Spójność danych40/100

While key fields are populated and no disputes are detected, there are two critical data inconsistencies. Firstly, the contract duration is stated as 2 months in the basic information but extends to August 2029 for maintenance services in the requirements and draft contract. Secondly, the evaluation criteria weighting is contradictory, with individual quality sub-criteria each listed as 60% while the overall quality weight is also 60%.

•Critical inconsistency in contract duration (2 months vs. maintenance until 2029).
•Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria weighting (multiple 60% quality weights for sub-criteria).
Zrównoważony rozwój20/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU-funded, which often entails higher sustainability standards.

•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Lack of social or innovation aspects.

Mocne strony

Clear description of the procurement object and scope.
Supports e-procurement and electronic submission for accessibility.
Estimated value and key deadlines are clearly disclosed.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided, including a draft contract.
Evaluation criteria (price vs. quality split) are defined, though sub-criteria weighting is problematic.

Wątpliwości

Critical contradiction in the weighting of evaluation sub-criteria (e.g., multiple 60% quality weights).
Significant inconsistency in the stated contract duration (2 months vs. maintenance until 2029).
Mention of 'desired models' in technical specifications could limit competition if equivalents are not explicitly allowed.
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is slightly ambiguous, though the value is stated.

Rekomendacje

1. Immediately clarify and correct the evaluation criteria weighting to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Harmonize the stated contract duration across all tender documents and basic information to accurately reflect the full scope of the engagement.
3. Clarify whether 'desired models' in the technical specifications allow for equivalent alternatives to promote broader competition.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty