Behöver du hjälp av en upphandlingsexpert? Se vår tjänst för anbudsförberedelse
Upphandlingar

Purchase of presentation equipment for the exhibition „I want to play!“

Stängd

Sista anbudsdag har passerat

Sista anbudsdag för denna upphandling har passerat och inga fler ansökningar accepteras. Informationen nedan sparas för referensändamål.

Bläddra bland aktiva upphandlingar
Sista anbudsdag
Utgånget
2 februari 2026
Avtalsdetaljer
Kategori
Leveranser
Referens
305232
Värde
€25,000
Plats
Estonia, Estland
Publicerad
22 januari 2026
CPV-kod
Tidsplan för projektet

Upphandling publicerad

22 januari 2026

Sista dag för frågor

26 januari 2026

Sista anbudsdag

2 februari 2026

Anbudsöppning

2 februari 2026

Avtalets startdatum

6 februari 2026

VinstsannolikhetPRO
🔒
Uppgradera till Professional
Se din uppskattade vinstsannolikhet baserat på historisk data.
Uppgradera till Professional →
KöparinsikterPRO
🔒
Lås upp köparinsikter
Se utgiftsmönster, föredragna procedurer och mer.
Uppgradera till Professional →
SektorinsikterPRO
🔒
Lås upp sektorinsikter
Se genomsnittliga vinnande priser, konkurrensnivåer och marknadstrender.
Uppgradera till Professional →
Budget
€25,000
Varaktighet
2 månader
Plats
Estonia
Typ
Leveranser
62
Kvalitetspoäng/100
Bra
Marknadsjämförelse
Genomsnittligt vinnande pris
€104,435
Genomsnittligt antal anbud
2.5
Konkurrens
Låg
Vinnande små och medelstora företag
94%
311 analyserade upphandlingar

Ursprunglig beskrivning av upphandling

Hange hõlmab Teatri- ja Muusikamuuseumi ruumides (Müürivahe 12, Tallinn) avatava tegevusnäituse "Tahan mängida!" digilahenduste esitlusseadmete tarnet.
Elektronisk inlämning

Kör riskanalys

Identifiera potentiella risker, inkonsekvenser och varningsflaggor i alla upphandlingsdokument. Få en detaljerad riskrapport med allvarlighetsgrader och rekommendationer för åtgärder.

Logga in

Vinnande strategi

Få en AI-driven vinnande strategi anpassad för denna upphandling. Inkluderar poäng för vinstsannolikhet, viktiga möjligheter och utmaningar, rekommenderade fokusområden för anbudet, insikter om konkurrenspositionering och handlingsbara rekommendationer för att maximera dina chanser.

Logga in

Konkurrenter

Uppgradera för att se vilka företag som sannolikt kommer att lämna anbud på denna upphandling, baserat på historisk upphandlingsdata.

Logga in

Krav och kvalifikationer

20 krav inom 5 kategorier

Inlämning (4)
Obligatorisk (2)
Regelefterlevnad (4)
Teknisk (7)
Ekonomisk (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the exclusion grounds and qualification criteria in the electronically completed ESPD.
--The bidder must confirm that the bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--The bid cost must be submitted using the document "305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The economic operator must not be subject to any exclusion grounds specified by the contracting authority.
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the exclusion grounds in the electronically completed ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must comply with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Conditional bids are prohibited.
--The economic operator must declare compliance with the qualification criteria in the electronically completed ESPD.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must meet the technical requirements and terms of reference for the purchase of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition.
--The bid must comply with the detailed technical specifications for presentation equipment (screens, media players, speakers), including desired models, as described in Annex 1.
--The bid must comply with the detailed technical specifications and functional requirements for digital exhibits (video content, activation mechanisms, presentation methods) as described in Annex 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for the purchase of presentation equipment (screens, players, speakers) for the "I want to play!" exhibition, in accordance with the specified specifications.
--The bid price is an evaluation criterion (40% weight).
--The bid cost must be submitted using the specific form.

Förhandsgranskning av krav

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Dokument

9 dokument tillgängliga med AI-sammanfattningar

VastavustingimusedPDF
305232_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm that their tender proposal complies with all conditions set forth in the procurement documents, prohibiting conditional bids.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305232_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.6 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the procurement of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition, where price accounts for 40% and quality for 60%, covering compliance with the terms of reference, delivery time, warranty period, and response time.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305232_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

This explanatory document outlines the contracting authority's conditions regarding exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, which companies must declare in the electronically submitted European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Tehniline kirjeldus / lähteülesanneDOC
305232_Tahan mängida_Digilahenduste esitlusse... -- 53.0 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications and terms of reference for the procurement of presentation equipment for the "I want to play!" exhibition.

LepinguprojektDOC
305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_... -- 44.5 KB

This draft contract outlines the purchase, delivery, and necessary maintenance of presentation equipment and technology for the "Tahan mängida!" exhibition, covering the period from March 6, 2026, to August 31, 2029.

Pakkumuse maksumuse vormXLS
305232_Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete ostmine_... -- 20.2 KB

This document is an offer cost form requiring bidders to provide a detailed price proposal for the purchase of exhibition presentation equipment, such as screens, players, and speakers, for the "I want to play!" exhibition, according to specified parameters.

TK lisa 1 Esitlusseadmete spetsifikatsioonXLS
Lisa 1 Tahan mängida_Esitlusseadmete spetsifi... -- 22.2 KB

This document details the technical specifications and desired models for presentation equipment, such as screens, media players, and speakers, required for the "I want to play!" exhibition.

TK lisa 2 digieksponaatide kirjeldusXLS
Lisa 2 Tahan mängida_digieksponaatide kirjeld... -- 76.9 KB

This document details the technical specifications and functional requirements for the digital exhibits of the "Tahan mängida!" exhibition, including video content, activation mechanisms, and presentation methods.

TK lisa 3 Näituse ruumiplaanZIP
Lisa 3 Näituse ruumiplaan.zip -- 19.7 MB

Ingen sammanfattning tillgänglig för detta dokument.

Förhandsgranskning av dokument

Registrera dig för att se dokumentöversikter och analyser

62
Bra

Upphandlingskvalitetspoäng

Overall, this tender is well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but it contains critical inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration that require immediate clarification. These issues significantly impact clarity, fairness, and data consistency.

Poängfördelning

Regelefterlevnad75/100

The tender appears generally compliant with national procurement regulations for a simplified procedure of this value. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and standard exclusion grounds are applied via ESPD. However, the significant internal inconsistencies could lead to legal challenges if not rectified.

•Potential legal risk due to contradictory evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration inconsistencies.
Tydlighet60/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, and requirements are generally well-documented. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a severe contradiction in the weighting of evaluation criteria, where individual quality sub-criteria are each assigned 60% weight, while the overall quality weight is also 60%. This is a critical flaw that creates significant ambiguity.

•Contradictory weighting of evaluation criteria (e.g., multiple 60% quality weights for sub-criteria when overall quality is 60%).
•Ambiguity regarding 'desired models' in technical specifications; it should be clear if equivalents are accepted.
Fullständighet70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. A comprehensive set of tender documents is attached. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the stated contract duration between the basic information (2 months) and the detailed requirements/draft contract (maintenance until 2029).

•Inconsistency in contract duration (2 months in basic info vs. maintenance until 2029 in requirements/draft contract).
Rättvisa65/100

The tender supports e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting equal access. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the contradictory evaluation criteria weighting severely undermines transparency and fairness in how bids will be assessed. The mention of 'desired models' in technical specifications could also potentially limit competition if not explicitly allowing for equivalent alternatives.

•Contradictory weighting of evaluation criteria creates an unfair and opaque bidding environment.
•'Desired models' in technical specifications could potentially tailor requirements to specific companies if equivalents are not clearly allowed.
Praktisk genomförbarhet65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. However, the significant inconsistency in the stated contract duration makes it practically challenging for bidders to accurately understand the full scope of the engagement and prepare a comprehensive, long-term price offer that includes maintenance services until 2029.

•Inconsistent contract duration makes it difficult for bidders to plan and price the full scope of work accurately.
Datakonsistens40/100

While key fields are populated and no disputes are detected, there are two critical data inconsistencies. Firstly, the contract duration is stated as 2 months in the basic information but extends to August 2029 for maintenance services in the requirements and draft contract. Secondly, the evaluation criteria weighting is contradictory, with individual quality sub-criteria each listed as 60% while the overall quality weight is also 60%.

•Critical inconsistency in contract duration (2 months vs. maintenance until 2029).
•Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria weighting (multiple 60% quality weights for sub-criteria).
Hållbarhet20/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU-funded, which often entails higher sustainability standards.

•Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Lack of social or innovation aspects.

Styrkor

Clear description of the procurement object and scope.
Supports e-procurement and electronic submission for accessibility.
Estimated value and key deadlines are clearly disclosed.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided, including a draft contract.
Evaluation criteria (price vs. quality split) are defined, though sub-criteria weighting is problematic.

Potentiella problem

Critical contradiction in the weighting of evaluation sub-criteria (e.g., multiple 60% quality weights).
Significant inconsistency in the stated contract duration (2 months vs. maintenance until 2029).
Mention of 'desired models' in technical specifications could limit competition if equivalents are not explicitly allowed.
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is slightly ambiguous, though the value is stated.

Rekommendationer

1. Immediately clarify and correct the evaluation criteria weighting to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Harmonize the stated contract duration across all tender documents and basic information to accurately reflect the full scope of the engagement.
3. Clarify whether 'desired models' in the technical specifications allow for equivalent alternatives to promote broader competition.

Förhandsgranskning av AI-poäng

Registrera dig för att se fullständiga krav och analyser

Fullständig analys av kvalitetsbetyg
Detaljerad uppdelning av delpoäng
Insikter om styrkor och svagheter
Strategiska rekommendationer

Inget kreditkort krävs • Konfiguration på 2 minuter