Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.
Kirjaudu sisäänHanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.
Kirjaudu sisäänPäivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.
Kirjaudu sisään13 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa
Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin
7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla
This document outlines the conditions for submitting a bid, including confirming compliance with tender terms, submitting a cost table, ensuring qualified personnel (with switching rights and a designated C-person) are registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal, and providing representation details.
Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.
Bidders must submit a list of at least three successfully completed similar electrical construction contracts from the last 60 months, with one contract valued at a minimum of 40,000 euros (excl. VAT).
This document specifies that bids will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost, with the lowest price being the best and carrying a 100% weight.
This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds for bidders, such as criminal offenses, tax debts, and past contract breaches, and qualification conditions requiring at least three successfully completed similar electrical construction contracts within the last 60 months.
Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.
Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.
Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin
This tender for electrical connection works is generally well-structured but suffers from significant fairness concerns due to a disproportionately high technical capability requirement and a critical contradiction in evaluation criteria.
The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and correctly assigns the CPV code. However, the procedure type codes are undefined, and there is a critical contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria and the explicit 'lowest total cost, 100% weight' in the documents, posing a legal compliance risk.
The project description and performance conditions are clear, and most requirements are well-documented. However, the fundamental contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria creates significant ambiguity for bidders. Undefined procedure codes also reduce overall clarity.
Basic information, value, and deadlines are provided. The contract duration is implicitly defined by the work completion date but not explicitly stated. Crucially, several essential tender documents (Tööprojekt, Maksumuse tabel, Väikehanke alusdokumendid) were not analyzed due to file format, limiting a full assessment of completeness.
While the value is disclosed and e-procurement is enabled, the requirement for bidders to have completed a similar contract valued at a minimum of 40,000 EUR (excl. VAT) is disproportionately high compared to this tender's estimated value of 22,492 EUR. This criterion is overly restrictive and could significantly limit competition, potentially favoring specific, larger companies. The contradiction in evaluation criteria also reduces transparency.
Electronic submission is supported, and financing information is detailed. The contract start date is known, and performance condition URLs are provided. However, the restrictive technical capability requirement (from a fairness perspective) could make it impractical for many otherwise capable bidders to participate.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria, with 'relative_weighting' listed in characteristics contradicting the 'lowest total cost, 100% weight' specified in the evaluation document. The 'Value Classified: Yes' while the value is disclosed is also a minor inconsistency.
The tender is noted as EU Funded, which often implies higher standards. However, no explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are detailed in the provided information.
Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin
Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa
Hei! Olen tekoälyavustajasi tässä hankinnassa. Voin auttaa sinua ymmärtämään vaatimuksia, määräaikoja, kelpoisuuskriteerejä ja tarjoamaan strategisia oivalluksia.
Luottokorttia ei vaadita