St Augustine Academy ~ Siivouskilpailutus

This tender provides a clear description of the required cleaning services and operational challenges, utilizing an e-procurement platform. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly compromises fairness and transparency, while sustainability aspects are largely overlooked.

The tender defines the procedure as 'Open' and assigns a relevant CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Competitive flexible procedure' lacks a specific code or detailed definition, and while an estimated value is given, the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag introduces a minor transparency concern. The missing reveal date is also a minor point.

The description of the services, the school's context, and the desired operational improvements (e.g., shift to post-school cleaning, optimizing hours) are clear and well-articulated. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

The tender includes all basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and CPV code. Key documents are referenced and accessible via the e-sourcing portal. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant gap, and the 'Liable Person' field is empty, as are the specific codes for the procedure type.

The tender utilizes an e-procurement platform and provides full document access, promoting equal access. Requirements appear generic and problem-focused rather than tailored to a specific company. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw that severely undermines the fairness and transparency of the procurement process, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their submissions will be judged.

Electronic submission is clearly supported via the provided Litmus TMS portal links. The contract start date and duration are explicitly stated, and document URLs are readily available. This ensures a practical and accessible submission process for potential suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent (submission deadline before contract start). There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field and missing specific procedure codes.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. While the request for 'optimal use of current hours' and addressing 'inefficiencies' implies a focus on operational efficiency, it is not framed within a broader sustainability or innovation context. The tender is not EU funded.