Tenders

Procurement of routine technical maintenance service for objects Savi tn 6, Tartu and J.Liivi tn 4, Tartu

Open
Deadline
7 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306519
Value
€162,094
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the service100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€162,094
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
85
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€229,828
Avg. Bids
4.0
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
68%
135 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Ordering of routine technical maintenance service for the object Savi tn 6 for up to 74 months, in the scope of EVS codes 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 270 and 289, with an estimated service start date of 01.07.2026 on a 3+1+1+1 basis. Ordering of routine technical maintenance service for the object J. Liivi tn 4, for up to 39 months, in the scope of EVS codes 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 270 and 289, with an estimated service start date of 01.06.2026.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with all mandatory exclusion grounds as stipulated in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306519_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.3 KB

This document outlines the tender submission conditions, including marking business secrets, completing Forms 2 and 3 for price submission, and specifying requirements for the project manager's education, professional qualification, and work experience.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 17.9 KB

This mandatory form serves as the bidder's declaration, confirming the bid's compliance with and acceptance of all tender conditions, acknowledging all aspects of the work and the bid cost from Form 3, and allowing for the designation of business secrets.

Vorm 3XLS
VORM 3.xlsx -- 30.2 KB

This document is a tender cost table requiring bidders to fill in prices for regular and additional services, as well as the total contract value, for the routine technical maintenance service procurement in Tartu.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4.docx -- 20.1 KB

This form is for submitting the CV of the proposed Project Manager, detailing their education, professional certificates, and experience in technical maintenance services relevant to the tender.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8.docx -- 13.8 KB

This form is a power of attorney for submitting a joint bid, where one or more bidders authorize another bidder to act on their behalf in the procurement procedure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306519_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, where the total cost of the service is the sole criterion (100% weight), and the lowest price receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306519_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.8 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the conditions and requirements of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) that bidders must complete electronically, not a form to be filled out.

Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 44.2 KB

This document is a proposal for submitting a bid, outlining the conditions for a technical maintenance public procurement in Tartu, specifying electronic submission, accepted formats, referring to the technical description and contract draft, and providing contact details and site visit times.

Lisa 1.1. Savi tn 6, Vahi alevik_tehniline kirjeldusXLS
Lisa 11 Savi tn 6, Vahi alevik_tehniline kirj... -- 42.2 KB

This document describes the technical conditions and special requirements for routine technical maintenance services at the Savi tn 6, Vahi alevik, Tartu property, including the need for a background check.

Lisa 1.2. J.Liivi 4, Tartu_tehniline kirjeldusXLS
Lisa 12 JLiivi 4, Tartu_tehniline kirjeldus.x... -- 34.1 KB

This document describes the technical specifications and special conditions for routine technical maintenance services for the former National Archives building located at J. Liivi 4, Tartu.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 124.8 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the general and special conditions for providing routine technical maintenance services at properties located at Savi tn 6 and J.Liivi tn 4 in Tartu, defining terms and contact persons.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

85
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and transparent, providing clear requirements and evaluation criteria for a routine technical maintenance service. While it incorporates green procurement, there is scope to enhance its sustainability aspects by including social and innovation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, clear CPV codes, and adherence to e-procurement standards including ESPD and WTO/GPA. The procedure type is indicated by code 'A', which is standard. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The procedure type code 'A' is not explicitly defined in the provided text, though it's standard.
"Value Classified: Yes" while the value is disclosed is a minor data inconsistency.
Clarity90/100

The tender description is clear, specifying services, locations, and durations. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as 100% lowest price. Technical specifications and contract terms are indicated to be in attached documents.

Completeness95/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of 13 documents, including technical specifications, contract draft, and mandatory forms, is listed.

Fairness95/100

The tender exhibits high fairness with full document access, disclosed estimated value, and objective 100% price-based evaluation criteria. Electronic submission ensures equal access. The justification for not dividing the tender into parts is transparent and reasonable.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the contract start date being "presumptive and has no legal meaning" introduces uncertainty for bidders' planning. Explicit financing information beyond the estimated value is not provided.

Contract start date is presumptive, potentially impacting bidder planning.
Lack of explicit financing information.
Data Consistency95/100

The tender data is highly consistent, with all key fields populated and logical sequencing of dates. The minor discrepancy of "Value Classified: Yes" alongside the disclosed value is likely a system artifact and does not hinder transparency.

Minor inconsistency with "Value Classified: Yes" while value is disclosed.
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly includes "Green Procurement" as a characteristic, which is a positive step towards environmental sustainability. However, it lacks explicit social criteria and an innovation focus, limiting its broader sustainability impact. It is not EU funded.

No social criteria
No innovation focus

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% price)
Comprehensive documentation provided
Explicit green procurement characteristic
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Transparent justification for not dividing into lots

Concerns

Contract start date is explicitly stated as "presumptive" and without legal meaning, which can create planning uncertainty
Lack of explicit social criteria and innovation focus in sustainability
No specific financing information beyond estimated value

Recommendations

1. Clarify the implications of the "presumptive" contract start date or provide a more definitive timeline.
2. Consider integrating social criteria and encouraging innovative solutions to enhance the tender's overall sustainability profile.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline