Tenders

Construction of a Nitocellulose-Based Film Repository

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306473
Value
€859,855
Location
Estonia
Published
February 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost (contract price) excl. VAT80%
Work organization plan15%
Competence of the construction project manager5%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€859,855
Duration
11 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
84
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

A new building will be constructed as a repository for nitocellulose-based films for the National Archives Film Archive, including associated roads, yards, and external utilities.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (3)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--The bid must be submitted electronically in accepted formats.
--The bidder must accept the terms and conditions of the public procurement.
--Business secrets must be marked in the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--The bidder and its subcontractors must meet the exclusion criteria of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
--The bidder must provide answers regarding the subcontractor verification conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must meet the qualification criteria of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The project manager must possess the required competence, which is evaluated based on evaluation criterion N2.
--The site manager must possess the required competence.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Works must be performed using the full general contracting method.
--The bid must comply with the technical specifications and scope for the construction of the nitrocellulose-based film storage facility, as described in Annex 1 Technical Description of Construction Works.
--Any reference to a standard or other basis must be read with the note "or equivalent".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for design and construction works, completed on Form 3.
--The cost of the bid constitutes 80% of the evaluation criteria.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306473_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, and requires the tenderer to provide responses regarding these conditions.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306473_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.6 KB

This document outlines mandatory tender submission conditions, including requirements for accepting tender terms, marking business secrets, structuring the bid price using Forms 2 and 3, and specifying the qualifications for the Project Manager and Site Manager.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2 (1802).docx -- 19.0 KB

This form is a tender submission application where the bidder confirms acceptance of all procurement conditions, the offer's cost alignment with Form 3, and declares subcontractors while ensuring their compliance with wage requirements.

Vorm 3XLS
Vorm 3 (1802).xlsx -- 42.2 KB

This document is the tender cost table (Form 3) that bidders must complete with a detailed price offer for design and construction works.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1802).docx -- 18.7 KB

This form is required for tender submission to provide CVs for the project manager, site manager, and high-voltage specialist, including their professional certificate numbers, to demonstrate their competence according to evaluation criterion N2.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1802).docx -- 18.7 KB

This form is for submitting the CVs of key personnel (project manager, site manager, strong current specialist) required for the tender, including their name, date of birth, and professional certificate number to demonstrate their competence according to evaluation criterion N2.

Vorm 5DOC
Vorm 5 - Töökorralduskava.docx -- 36.1 KB

This form requires bidders to submit a detailed work organization plan, describing project management, potential construction errors, and risk mitigation strategies for CLT, building automation, rotary dryer climate systems, and precast concrete element construction.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8 (1802).docx -- 13.7 KB

This form is required for submitting a joint bid to authorize one of the bidders to act on behalf of the others, specifying the details of the authorizing party(ies) and the authorized bidder.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306473_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and their weightings, focusing on cost (80%), project manager competence (5%), and the work organization plan (15%).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306473_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.1 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions and response format, outlining bidder qualification and exclusion grounds, but it is not to be completed as the actual ESPD is filled out electronically.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_2025 (1... -- 1.8 MB

This document details the technical specifications and scope of work for the construction of a nitrocellulose-based film storage facility in Rakvere, including project documents, site details, and building characteristics.

Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt (1802).docx -- 97.8 KB

This document is a draft design and construction contract, outlining general and special conditions, penalty clauses, and contact information for the future contract parties.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek (1802).docx -- 65.3 KB

This document outlines the electronic submission process for the "Construction of a Nitrocellulose-based film storage facility" tender, specifying accepted formats, criteria for unreasonably low bids, and evaluation criteria (price, project manager's competence, work organization plan).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

84
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a nitrocellulose-based film storage facility is generally well-structured and compliant, offering clear requirements and transparent evaluation. However, it notably lacks explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, utilizing standard procedures like ESPD and clearly defining the procedure type and CPV codes. All mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a good practice.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a publicly disclosed estimated value (859,855.00 EUR) presents a minor ambiguity, though the value itself is transparent.
Clarity90/100

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the project scope effectively. Requirements are well-documented and understandable, categorized logically by the AI. Evaluation criteria are explicitly specified with clear weightings, and performance conditions are outlined in the technical specifications and draft contract.

Completeness95/100

This tender is highly complete, providing all basic information, financial details, timeline, and location data. A comprehensive set of 14 documents, including technical specifications, draft contract, and various submission forms, ensures all requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined and accessible.

One XML document (ESPD) was not AI-analyzed, but this is a technical limitation of the analysis tool rather than a deficiency in the tender's completeness, as ESPDs are typically filled electronically.
Fairness90/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, and transparent, objective evaluation criteria (80% cost, 5% project manager competence, 15% work organization plan). Electronic submission is enabled, and requirements appear generic, without any indication of being tailored to a specific company.

Practicality75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and provides a portal URL, enhancing practical accessibility. The duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is explicitly stated as presumptive, which could introduce planning uncertainties for bidders.

The contract start date is presumptive and lacks legal meaning, which may complicate precise planning for potential contractors.
Financing information beyond the estimated value is not explicitly detailed (e.g., source of funds).
Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender documentation. There are no detected suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable and reliable procurement process.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, despite the estimated value being disclosed, creates a minor, albeit likely superficial, inconsistency in data presentation.
Sustainability20/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on environmental sustainability (green procurement), social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader societal and environmental benefits into the procurement process, especially for a construction project.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive documentation with detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria, with a significant weighting on cost.
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility.
Use of standard procurement tools like ESPD and 'or equivalent' clauses for flexibility.
All essential tender information (value, duration, location) is clearly provided.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in the tender.
The contract start date is stated as presumptive, which could lead to planning uncertainties.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a disclosed value is a minor data ambiguity.
Absence of explicit financing source details.

Recommendations

1. Integrate specific environmental, social, and innovation criteria into future tenders, especially for construction projects.
2. Provide a more definitive or estimated contract start date to aid bidder planning.
3. Clarify the 'Value Classified' flag if the value is indeed publicly disclosed to avoid any perceived inconsistency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline