Retour aux appels d'offres

Construction d'un dépôt de films à base de nitrocellulose

Ouvert
Date limite
13 jours restants
Mars 16, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306473
Valeur
€859,855
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 18, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost (contract price) excl. VAT80%
Work organization plan15%
Competence of the construction project manager5%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 18, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 09, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 16, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 16, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€859,855
Durée
11 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
84
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Un nouveau bâtiment sera construit comme dépôt pour les films à base de nitrocellulose pour les Archives cinématographiques des Archives nationales, y compris les routes, les cours et les réseaux externes associés.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

24 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (11)
Obligatoire (3)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--The bid must be submitted electronically in accepted formats.
--The bidder must accept the terms and conditions of the public procurement.
--Business secrets must be marked in the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--The bidder and its subcontractors must meet the exclusion criteria of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
--The bidder must provide answers regarding the subcontractor verification conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must meet the qualification criteria of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The project manager must possess the required competence, which is evaluated based on evaluation criterion N2.
--The site manager must possess the required competence.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Works must be performed using the full general contracting method.
--The bid must comply with the technical specifications and scope for the construction of the nitrocellulose-based film storage facility, as described in Annex 1 Technical Description of Construction Works.
--Any reference to a standard or other basis must be read with the note "or equivalent".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for design and construction works, completed on Form 3.
--The cost of the bid constitutes 80% of the evaluation criteria.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

13 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306473_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, and requires the tenderer to provide responses regarding these conditions.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306473_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.6 KB

This document outlines mandatory tender submission conditions, including requirements for accepting tender terms, marking business secrets, structuring the bid price using Forms 2 and 3, and specifying the qualifications for the Project Manager and Site Manager.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2 (1802).docx -- 19.0 KB

This form is a tender submission application where the bidder confirms acceptance of all procurement conditions, the offer's cost alignment with Form 3, and declares subcontractors while ensuring their compliance with wage requirements.

Vorm 3XLS
Vorm 3 (1802).xlsx -- 42.2 KB

This document is the tender cost table (Form 3) that bidders must complete with a detailed price offer for design and construction works.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1802).docx -- 18.7 KB

This form is required for tender submission to provide CVs for the project manager, site manager, and high-voltage specialist, including their professional certificate numbers, to demonstrate their competence according to evaluation criterion N2.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1802).docx -- 18.7 KB

This form is for submitting the CVs of key personnel (project manager, site manager, strong current specialist) required for the tender, including their name, date of birth, and professional certificate number to demonstrate their competence according to evaluation criterion N2.

Vorm 5DOC
Vorm 5 - Töökorralduskava.docx -- 36.1 KB

This form requires bidders to submit a detailed work organization plan, describing project management, potential construction errors, and risk mitigation strategies for CLT, building automation, rotary dryer climate systems, and precast concrete element construction.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8 (1802).docx -- 13.7 KB

This form is required for submitting a joint bid to authorize one of the bidders to act on behalf of the others, specifying the details of the authorizing party(ies) and the authorized bidder.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306473_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and their weightings, focusing on cost (80%), project manager competence (5%), and the work organization plan (15%).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306473_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.1 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions and response format, outlining bidder qualification and exclusion grounds, but it is not to be completed as the actual ESPD is filled out electronically.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_2025 (1... -- 1.8 MB

This document details the technical specifications and scope of work for the construction of a nitrocellulose-based film storage facility in Rakvere, including project documents, site details, and building characteristics.

Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt (1802).docx -- 97.8 KB

This document is a draft design and construction contract, outlining general and special conditions, penalty clauses, and contact information for the future contract parties.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek (1802).docx -- 65.3 KB

This document outlines the electronic submission process for the "Construction of a Nitrocellulose-based film storage facility" tender, specifying accepted formats, criteria for unreasonably low bids, and evaluation criteria (price, project manager's competence, work organization plan).

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

84
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for the construction of a nitrocellulose-based film storage facility is generally well-structured and compliant, offering clear requirements and transparent evaluation. However, it notably lacks explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, utilizing standard procedures like ESPD and clearly defining the procedure type and CPV codes. All mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a good practice.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a publicly disclosed estimated value (859,855.00 EUR) presents a minor ambiguity, though the value itself is transparent.
Clarté90/100

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the project scope effectively. Requirements are well-documented and understandable, categorized logically by the AI. Evaluation criteria are explicitly specified with clear weightings, and performance conditions are outlined in the technical specifications and draft contract.

Exhaustivité95/100

This tender is highly complete, providing all basic information, financial details, timeline, and location data. A comprehensive set of 14 documents, including technical specifications, draft contract, and various submission forms, ensures all requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined and accessible.

One XML document (ESPD) was not AI-analyzed, but this is a technical limitation of the analysis tool rather than a deficiency in the tender's completeness, as ESPDs are typically filled electronically.
Équité90/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, and transparent, objective evaluation criteria (80% cost, 5% project manager competence, 15% work organization plan). Electronic submission is enabled, and requirements appear generic, without any indication of being tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and provides a portal URL, enhancing practical accessibility. The duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is explicitly stated as presumptive, which could introduce planning uncertainties for bidders.

The contract start date is presumptive and lacks legal meaning, which may complicate precise planning for potential contractors.
Financing information beyond the estimated value is not explicitly detailed (e.g., source of funds).
Cohérence des données95/100

All key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender documentation. There are no detected suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable and reliable procurement process.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, despite the estimated value being disclosed, creates a minor, albeit likely superficial, inconsistency in data presentation.
Durabilité20/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on environmental sustainability (green procurement), social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader societal and environmental benefits into the procurement process, especially for a construction project.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Points forts

Clear and comprehensive documentation with detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria, with a significant weighting on cost.
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility.
Use of standard procurement tools like ESPD and 'or equivalent' clauses for flexibility.
All essential tender information (value, duration, location) is clearly provided.

Préoccupations

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in the tender.
The contract start date is stated as presumptive, which could lead to planning uncertainties.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a disclosed value is a minor data ambiguity.
Absence of explicit financing source details.

Recommandations

1. Integrate specific environmental, social, and innovation criteria into future tenders, especially for construction projects.
2. Provide a more definitive or estimated contract start date to aid bidder planning.
3. Clarify the 'Value Classified' flag if the value is indeed publicly disclosed to avoid any perceived inconsistency.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline