Tenders

Doors with automation and installation

Open
Deadline
2 days left
March 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306341
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 05, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
85
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€99,138
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
262 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a procurement contract for the purchase of 9 doors with automation for the intensive care unit of the University of Tartu Hospital.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--ESPD must be filled electronically.
--Declare commercial secrets according to the specified procedure.
--Address specific questions for the economic operator as per "vastavustingimused.pdf".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Meet the exclusion grounds described in the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Meet the qualification requirements described in the ESPD.
--If bidding as a joint venture/consortium, submit a power of attorney (using Form I) granting one partner the right to represent the consortium, sign the bid, and manage the contract.
--If bidding as a joint venture/consortium, meet the requirements for a power of attorney for joint bidders as described in "vastavustingimused.pdf".
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Adhere to the principles of equivalence in the bid (if offering alternatives, they must be equivalent to specified items).
--Be able to supply doors with automation and installation as described in the contract draft (Lisa 2).
--Understand and meet the requirements related to the object of the procurement (doors with automation and installation) as detailed in "Juhised pakkujale".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid price (excluding VAT) is the sole evaluation criterion; bidders should aim for the lowest possible price.
--Submit the bid price using "Lisa 1_Pakkumuse maksumus.xlsx", detailing unit and total costs for doors, automation, and installation works, adhering to technical requirements and quantities.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306341_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint tenderers' authorization, procedures for declaring business secrets, and principles for demonstrating equivalence in the bid, posing specific questions for the company to answer.

Lisa 1 - Pakkumuse maksumusXLS
Lisa 1_Pakkumuse maksumus.xlsx -- 13.1 KB

This document is a tender cost form requiring bidders to provide unit and total costs for doors, automation, and installation services, adhering to specified technical requirements and quantities.

Vorm II - AvaldusDOC
Vorm II_Avaldus.docx -- 18.9 KB

This form is for bidders to formally express their intent to participate in the "Doors with automation and installation" tender and provide their contact information.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306341_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, stating that the offer's cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion, weighted at 100%, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306341_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Tartu University Hospital's tender for doors with automation and installation, but it is not to be filled manually, only electronically.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale_Uksed automaatika ja paigal... -- 209.7 KB

This document provides general instructions for tenderers on submitting an offer for the open procurement "Doors with automation and installation," outlining the scope of work and procedural conditions.

HankelepingPDF
Lisa 2_Hankeleping.pdf -- 163.4 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the purchase of doors with automation and installation, specifying terms, pricing, delivery, and the obligations of the parties after a successful bid has been selected.

Vorm I - Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 18.7 KB

This form is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one partner to represent the consortium in the tender process, sign the offer, and manage the contract for the "Doors with automation and installation" procurement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

85
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured and highly transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and documentation, ensuring a fair and accessible procurement process. Its primary area for improvement lies in the integration of sustainability and social considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing ESPD, clearly defining the CPV code, and indicating an open procedure through context. All mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions.

The procedure type is generically listed as 'A (Code: A)', though contextually it's an open procedure.
Clarity90/100

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented and categorized by the AI extraction. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'lowest price', ensuring high clarity for bidders.

Completeness95/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. A comprehensive set of documents is attached, and requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined.

The metadata flag 'Value Classified: Yes' is present despite the estimated value being explicitly disclosed, which is a minor inconsistency.
Fairness95/100

Fairness is a strong point, with full document access, disclosed value, objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement. The explanation for not dividing the procurement enhances transparency and prevents perceptions of tailoring.

Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and provides a clear contract start date and duration. The document URL for the e-procurement system is also provided, facilitating access.

Explicit financing information (e.g., source of funds) is not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and all dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable tender process.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value, creating a minor data inconsistency in the metadata.
Sustainability20/100

The tender shows minimal focus on sustainability, lacking specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This is a common area for improvement in many procurements.

No green procurement criteria.
No social criteria included.

Strengths

Clear and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria.
Comprehensive documentation and well-structured requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Transparent explanation for not dividing the procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Inconsistent 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite value disclosure.
Absence of explicit financing source information.
Generic 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' codes.

Recommendations

1. Integrate sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where applicable in future tenders.
2. Clarify or correct metadata flags like 'Value Classified' if the value is public.
3. Explicitly state the financing source for enhanced transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline