Retour aux appels d'offres

Portes avec automatisation et installation

Ouvert
Date limite
2 jours restants
Mars 05, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
306341
Valeur
€50,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 16, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Offer cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 16, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 26, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 05, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 05, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 01, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Voir l'original
Budget
€50,000
Durée
6 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
85
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€99,138
Offres moyennes
2.1
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
93%
262 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de l'appel d'offres est de conclure un contrat d'approvisionnement pour l'achat de 9 portes avec automatisation pour l'unité de soins intensifs de l'hôpital universitaire de Tartu.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

19 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (9)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (4)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--ESPD must be filled electronically.
--Declare commercial secrets according to the specified procedure.
--Address specific questions for the economic operator as per "vastavustingimused.pdf".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Meet the exclusion grounds described in the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Meet the qualification requirements described in the ESPD.
--If bidding as a joint venture/consortium, submit a power of attorney (using Form I) granting one partner the right to represent the consortium, sign the bid, and manage the contract.
--If bidding as a joint venture/consortium, meet the requirements for a power of attorney for joint bidders as described in "vastavustingimused.pdf".
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Adhere to the principles of equivalence in the bid (if offering alternatives, they must be equivalent to specified items).
--Be able to supply doors with automation and installation as described in the contract draft (Lisa 2).
--Understand and meet the requirements related to the object of the procurement (doors with automation and installation) as detailed in "Juhised pakkujale".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid price (excluding VAT) is the sole evaluation criterion; bidders should aim for the lowest possible price.
--Submit the bid price using "Lisa 1_Pakkumuse maksumus.xlsx", detailing unit and total costs for doors, automation, and installation works, adhering to technical requirements and quantities.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306341_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint tenderers' authorization, procedures for declaring business secrets, and principles for demonstrating equivalence in the bid, posing specific questions for the company to answer.

Lisa 1 - Pakkumuse maksumusXLS
Lisa 1_Pakkumuse maksumus.xlsx -- 13.1 KB

This document is a tender cost form requiring bidders to provide unit and total costs for doors, automation, and installation services, adhering to specified technical requirements and quantities.

Vorm II - AvaldusDOC
Vorm II_Avaldus.docx -- 18.9 KB

This form is for bidders to formally express their intent to participate in the "Doors with automation and installation" tender and provide their contact information.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306341_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, stating that the offer's cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion, weighted at 100%, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306341_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Tartu University Hospital's tender for doors with automation and installation, but it is not to be filled manually, only electronically.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale_Uksed automaatika ja paigal... -- 209.7 KB

This document provides general instructions for tenderers on submitting an offer for the open procurement "Doors with automation and installation," outlining the scope of work and procedural conditions.

HankelepingPDF
Lisa 2_Hankeleping.pdf -- 163.4 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the purchase of doors with automation and installation, specifying terms, pricing, delivery, and the obligations of the parties after a successful bid has been selected.

Vorm I - Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 18.7 KB

This form is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one partner to represent the consortium in the tender process, sign the offer, and manage the contract for the "Doors with automation and installation" procurement.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

85
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is well-structured and highly transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and documentation, ensuring a fair and accessible procurement process. Its primary area for improvement lies in the integration of sustainability and social considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing ESPD, clearly defining the CPV code, and indicating an open procedure through context. All mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions.

•The procedure type is generically listed as 'A (Code: A)', though contextually it's an open procedure.
Clarté90/100

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented and categorized by the AI extraction. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'lowest price', ensuring high clarity for bidders.

Exhaustivité95/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. A comprehensive set of documents is attached, and requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined.

•The metadata flag 'Value Classified: Yes' is present despite the estimated value being explicitly disclosed, which is a minor inconsistency.
Équité95/100

Fairness is a strong point, with full document access, disclosed value, objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria, and enabled e-procurement. The explanation for not dividing the procurement enhances transparency and prevents perceptions of tailoring.

Aspect pratique80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and provides a clear contract start date and duration. The document URL for the e-procurement system is also provided, facilitating access.

•Explicit financing information (e.g., source of funds) is not provided.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and all dates are logical and sequential. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable tender process.

•The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value, creating a minor data inconsistency in the metadata.
Durabilité20/100

The tender shows minimal focus on sustainability, lacking specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This is a common area for improvement in many procurements.

•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria included.

Points forts

Clear and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria.
Comprehensive documentation and well-structured requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Transparent explanation for not dividing the procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Préoccupations

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Inconsistent 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite value disclosure.
Absence of explicit financing source information.
Generic 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' codes.

Recommandations

1. Integrate sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where applicable in future tenders.
2. Clarify or correct metadata flags like 'Value Classified' if the value is public.
3. Explicitly state the financing source for enhanced transparency.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline