Tenders

Design of reconstruction works for Tartu kindergarten Mõmmik

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306283
Value
€160,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 16, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer price without VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 05, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€160,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
76
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement contract is the design of reconstruction works for Tartu kindergarten Mõmmik. The aim is the full-scale reconstruction of the kindergarten building - primarily improving the energy efficiency of the building, reducing energy consumption, and ensuring a compliant indoor climate.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Fill out the ESPD electronically.
--Submit a power of attorney for joint bids (if applicable).
--Clearly mark business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Meet the exclusion criteria specified in the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Meet the qualification criteria specified in the ESPD.
--The bid must comply with the basic tender documents.
--Agree to the terms of cooperation between the designer and builder as outlined in the subordination agreement template.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Adhere to the project stages and deadlines specified in the draft contract.
--Possess the capability to provide architectural and engineering design services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet the insurance requirements specified in the draft contract.
--Submit a price for the services (excluding VAT).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306283_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.1 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including power of attorney for joint bids, rules for marking business secrets, compliance with tender documents, bid price structure, and equivalence principles.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306283_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Tender offers will be evaluated 100% based on the offer price without VAT, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306283_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.1 KB

This explanatory ESPD document outlines the qualification and exclusion criteria for the Tartu Mõmmik kindergarten reconstruction design tender, which bidders must complete electronically.

AllutamislepingDOC
Allutamisleping.docx -- 32.6 KB

This is a subordination agreement template that defines the cooperation between the designer and the main contractor for the Tartu Mõmmik kindergarten reconstruction project after the construction tender winner has been selected.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 86.2 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the design services of Tartu kindergarten Mõmmik reconstruction, detailing special conditions regarding client and contractor information, project stages, deadlines, and insurance requirements.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 43.0 KB

Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

76
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for kindergarten reconstruction design services is generally well-structured with clear objectives and transparent evaluation, but faces significant challenges due to inaccessible key documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears compliant with basic legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines, defined procedure type (though 'A' with 'Negotiation Allowed' could be more explicit for international understanding), and appropriate CPV codes. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% price-based, which is unambiguous, despite a minor inconsistency with the 'relative_weighting' characteristic.

Minor inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and 100% price evaluation criteria.
Key technical document ('Projekteerimise lähteülesanne lisadega') is a ZIP file, preventing AI analysis of its content clarity.
Completeness65/100

While basic information, deadlines, and value are present, the inability to process or download critical documents like the technical specification ('Projekteerimise lähteülesanne lisadega') and additional information ('Lisateave') significantly impacts the completeness assessment.

Crucial technical specification document ('Projekteerimise lähteülesanne lisadega') is a ZIP file and could not be analyzed.
Additional information document ('Lisateave') download failed, making its content unavailable.
Fairness70/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective price-based evaluation, and e-procurement. However, the inaccessibility of key documents could hinder fair competition by limiting bidders' full understanding of the scope.

Inability to access/summarize critical technical documents may impede fair competition.
Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and direct URLs to all documents (beyond the portal) presents minor practical inconveniences.

No explicit contract start date provided.
Direct URLs to individual tender documents are not explicitly listed in the basic information.
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The tender shows no signs of suspension or disputes, indicating good data integrity.

Minor inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and 100% price evaluation criteria.
Sustainability70/100

The tender explicitly focuses on improving energy efficiency and reducing energy consumption for the kindergarten, which is a strong green procurement aspect. However, it lacks explicit social or innovation criteria.

No explicit social criteria mentioned.
No explicit innovation focus mentioned.

Strengths

Clear project description with a focus on energy efficiency.
Transparent and objective 100% price-based evaluation criteria.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for accessibility.
Reasonable submission deadline (17 days).
Estimated value is disclosed, and no disputes are reported.

Concerns

Critical technical specification document ('Projekteerimise lähteülesanne lisadega') is inaccessible for content analysis.
Additional information document ('Lisateave') failed to download, creating an information gap.
Potential for reduced fairness due to inaccessible key documents.
Minor inconsistency in the description of evaluation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and provided in machine-readable formats for comprehensive review by all potential bidders.
2. Clarify any minor inconsistencies in the evaluation criteria descriptions to avoid ambiguity.
3. Consider explicitly incorporating social and innovation criteria where relevant to enhance sustainability aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline