Tenders

Purchase of a large-format printer

Open
Deadline
15 days left
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306219
Value
€25,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 16, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€25,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
86
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€87,029
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
388 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement procedure is the acquisition of a large-format printer in accordance with the technical specification provided in Annex 1 to the HD. The deadline for handing over the device is no later than 3 (three) months from the conclusion of the procurement contract.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (3)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-17 at 14:00:00 at the latest.
--The bid must be comprehensive, as the public procurement is not divided into parts.
--The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) must be used for submitting the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The tenderer must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per RHS § 88 (2), § 88 (5), or § 89 (2).
--The tenderer must submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in accordance with the requirements specified in the procurement passport.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must meet the qualification conditions set out in the 'Compliance Conditions' document.
--The tenderer must submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) to prove compliance with the qualification conditions.
--All references to standards or other requirements made in the procurement documents must be read as supplemented by 'or equivalent'.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The offered large format printer must meet the minimum requirements specified in Annex 1 'Technical Specification'.
--The bid must include installation conditions for the printer in accordance with the technical specification.
--The bid must include a solution for the utilization/disposal of the old equipment in accordance with the technical specification.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include a financial offer that accepts the contract price and payment terms described in the draft contract.
--The bid price must be submitted according to the requirements specified in the evaluation criteria document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306219_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

Tender document 'Vastavustingimused' in .PDF format (11,000 bytes).

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306219_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

Tender document 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' in .PDF format (3,281 bytes).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306219_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.7 KB

This document is an explanatory guide outlining the qualification conditions and exclusion grounds for Tartu University's large-format printer tender, intended for familiarization before electronically completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 126.5 KB

Tender document 'Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks' in .PDF format (129,557 bytes).

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 189.6 KB

This technical description for a large-format printer outlines the minimum requirements for the new printer, its installation, and the disposal of the old device, to ensure the quality of the university's printing services.

Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid).docx -- 30.4 KB

This document provides power of attorney forms for a bidder's representative to submit a tender and for a joint bidders' representative to submit a tender and conclude a contract.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 226.0 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the general terms, price, payment conditions, deadlines, and delivery terms for the purchase of a large-format printer between the University of Tartu and the seller.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkujale ja pakkumusele (16)PDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkuj... -- 174.8 KB

This document outlines the general conditions of the open procurement procedure, requirements for proposal submission, contract terms, and criteria for selecting the successful bid for the purchase of a large-format printer for the University of Tartu.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

86
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a large-format printer by Tartu Ülikool demonstrates strong legal compliance, clarity, and completeness, facilitating a fair and practical procurement process. While robust in its core aspects, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance90/100

The tender adheres well to national procurement regulations (RHS) and utilizes EU-standard tools like ESPD. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating a legally sound process.

Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable across various categories. The inclusion of an 'or equivalent' clause enhances clarity and flexibility for bidders.

Completeness90/100

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, and classification, is comprehensively provided. A good number of supporting documents are listed, ensuring bidders have access to necessary information.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement, reasonable submission deadlines, and the 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications, which prevents undue tailoring. No indications of tailoring to a specific company were found.

Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified: Yes' despite an estimated value being provided, which could cause minor confusion.
Practicality90/100

The tender supports electronic submission, provides a clear e-procurement portal URL, and specifies key dates like contract start and duration, making the process highly practical and accessible for bidders.

Data Consistency95/100

All key data fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information. No suspensions or disputes are reported, indicating high data integrity.

Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria. This represents a missed opportunity for promoting broader sustainability goals within the procurement process.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
Lack of social aspects.

Strengths

Strong legal compliance with national and EU standards.
Clear and well-structured requirements.
Comprehensive provision of essential tender information.
Facilitates fair competition through e-procurement and 'or equivalent' clauses.
High data consistency and practical submission process.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Minor ambiguity regarding the classification of the estimated value.

Recommendations

1. Consider integrating specific green procurement criteria for future tenders.
2. Explore opportunities to include social clauses or innovation incentives.
3. Clarify the 'Value Classified' field when an estimated value is provided.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline