Provision of the installation & maintenance of Wash & Dry Toilets

This tender presents significant transparency and fairness concerns due to the complete absence of evaluation criteria, despite clear service descriptions and basic information.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined, and there are no disputes. However, the tender lacks explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, detailed evaluation criteria, which are fundamental requirements for a legally sound procurement process. The absence of a reveal date also prevents full assessment of deadline reasonableness.

The service description and stated requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly impacts the clarity of how bids will be assessed, making the overall tender process opaque for potential suppliers.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location, is provided, and documents are available. However, critical information such as detailed evaluation criteria, explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds, and the liable person are missing.

Full document access and disclosed value are positive aspects. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw that severely undermines transparency and fairness, allowing for subjective selection. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access. While the strong preference for South Yorkshire suppliers limits competition, it is not considered tailoring to a specific company.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. No explicit document URL is provided in the basic information.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. While some key fields like 'Liable Person' and explicit mandatory exclusion/evaluation criteria are missing, the existing data points are consistent with each other.

The tender includes a positive social aspect by preferring SMEs and VCSEs. However, it lacks explicit focus on green procurement practices or innovation, and it is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.