Tenders

Gelatin compounds, intravenous solutions and additives, solvents and diluents for intravenous solutions, and parenteral nutrition solutions

Open
Deadline
15 days left
March 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306019
Value
€981,800
Location
Estonia
Published
February 12, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
24-month estimated cost of the tender part100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 17, 2026

Tender Opening

March 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€981,800
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
76
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of gelatin compounds, intravenous solutions and their additives, solvents and diluents, and parenteral nutrition solutions over a period of 24 months according to actual need.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must be submitted according to the general tender conditions and the e-procurement process.
--Complete and submit Form 1 (application for participation in public procurement).
--Complete and submit Form 2 (technical specification and price breakdown table).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders and their subcontractors/suppliers must not have restrictions related to EU sanctions.
--Must comply with the exclusion grounds described in the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must meet the qualification conditions described in the ESPD.
--The successful bidder must agree to the terms of the draft sales contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The contracting authority's preference for medicinal products with a marketing authorization must be considered.
--The bid must comply with the technical specification provided in Form 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The primary criterion for bid evaluation is the lowest 24-month estimated cost without taxes.
--The bidder must fill in the yellow cells in Form 2 with unit prices, which will be fixed for the entire framework agreement period.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306019_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 138.3 KB

This document outlines tender submission requirements, including filling out Forms 1 and 2, restrictions on subcontractors and suppliers due to EU sanctions, and conditions for joint bidders' power of attorney and marking business secrets.

Vorm 1DOC
Vorm 1 - riigihankes osalemise avaldus.doc -- 40.5 KB

Tender document 'Vorm 1' in .DOC format (41,472 bytes).

Vorm 2XLS
Vorm 2 - Tehniline kirjeldus_hinnajaotustabel... -- 31.4 KB

This document is a fillable form containing a technical description and price breakdown table, where the bidder must complete the yellow cells with unit prices that will be fixed for the entire framework agreement period, and consider the contracting authority's preference for medicinal products with marketing authorization.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306019_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 37.8 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and methodology, primarily based on the lowest 24-month estimated cost without taxes.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306019_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.9 KB

This document is an explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) detailing the contracting authority's conditions and requirements for the tender, serving as a guide for bidders to understand qualification criteria and exclusion grounds, but it is not to be filled out directly.

AlusdokumendidDOC
Alusdokumendid.docx -- 45.6 KB

These base documents provide an overview of the general conditions of the public procurement, the e-procurement process, rules for submitting offers, and refer to important appendices and forms.

Müügilepingu projektDOC
Müügilepingu projekt.docx -- 37.0 KB

This document is a draft sales contract outlining the terms for the purchase of medicines by Lääne-Tallinna Keskhaigla and other hospitals from the successful tenderer, based on the tender documents and the bidder's offer.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

76
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and transparent, but it presents a significant inconsistency between the stated procedure type and the allowance for negotiation, which requires clarification. It provides comprehensive documentation and clear evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The deadlines are reasonable, and references to ESPD and EU sanctions are present. However, the primary concern is the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic listed for an 'Open Procedure' (Type A), which is contradictory and could lead to legal challenges or confusion regarding the procurement process.

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' (Type A) and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Clarity85/100

The description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are generally clear and understandable. Documentation is comprehensive, including specific forms and a draft contract. A minor ambiguity arises from the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic conflicting with the stated procedure type.

Slight ambiguity due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Completeness80/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration (24 months) are all specified. Documents are attached, and requirements are defined. However, the NUTS code is missing, and the explicit delivery location is not detailed in the basic information, though implied by the organization and contract.

Missing NUTS code.
Explicit delivery location not detailed in basic information.
Fairness90/100

Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criteria (lowest cost) are objective and transparent. Electronic submission is enabled, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. The tender being 'Divided into Parts' also promotes fair competition.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the duration is clearly specified as 24 months. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly in the basic info, this is often determined post-award. Financing conditions refer to the contract, which is provided.

Contract start date not explicitly stated in basic information.
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The significant inconsistency lies in the 'Type: A' (Open Procedure) being listed alongside 'Negotiation Allowed', which represents a fundamental contradiction in the procurement process definition.

Inconsistency between procedure type ('Open Procedure') and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Sustainability30/100

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information or AI summaries. The tender is not specified as EU funded.

Absence of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear financial requirements and objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost).
Comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and specific forms.
High transparency with disclosed value and electronic submission.
Reasonable submission deadline and tender divided into parts.
E-procurement enabled for equal access.

Concerns

Significant inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed', requiring urgent clarification.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Missing NUTS code and explicit delivery location in the basic information.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the procedure type and whether negotiation is truly permitted, ensuring consistency with national procurement regulations.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where feasible, even for medical supplies, to align with modern procurement best practices.
3. Ensure all standard fields like NUTS code and explicit delivery location are populated for full completeness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline