Tenders

Związki żelatyny, roztwory dożylne i dodatki do roztworów dożylnych, rozpuszczalniki i rozcieńczalniki do roztworów dożylnych oraz roztwory do żywienia pozajelitowego

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 15 dni
Marzec 17, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Dostawy
Numer Referencyjny
306019
Wartość
€981,800
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 12, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
24-month estimated cost of the tender part100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 12, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 10, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 17, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 17, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€981,800
Duration
Not specified
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Dostawy
76
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€92,792
Śr. liczba ofert
2.2
Konkurencja
Niska
Zwycięzcy MŚP
86%
3,220 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Zakup związków żelatyny, roztworów dożylnych i ich dodatków, rozpuszczalników i rozcieńczalników oraz roztworów do żywienia pozajelitowego w okresie 24 miesięcy, zgodnie z rzeczywistym zapotrzebowaniem.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

13 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (5)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (2)
Techniczne (2)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must be submitted according to the general tender conditions and the e-procurement process.
--Complete and submit Form 1 (application for participation in public procurement).
--Complete and submit Form 2 (technical specification and price breakdown table).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders and their subcontractors/suppliers must not have restrictions related to EU sanctions.
--Must comply with the exclusion grounds described in the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must meet the qualification conditions described in the ESPD.
--The successful bidder must agree to the terms of the draft sales contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The contracting authority's preference for medicinal products with a marketing authorization must be considered.
--The bid must comply with the technical specification provided in Form 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The primary criterion for bid evaluation is the lowest 24-month estimated cost without taxes.
--The bidder must fill in the yellow cells in Form 2 with unit prices, which will be fixed for the entire framework agreement period.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

7 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

VastavustingimusedPDF
306019_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 138.3 KB

This document outlines tender submission requirements, including filling out Forms 1 and 2, restrictions on subcontractors and suppliers due to EU sanctions, and conditions for joint bidders' power of attorney and marking business secrets.

Vorm 1DOC
Vorm 1 - riigihankes osalemise avaldus.doc -- 40.5 KB

Tender document 'Vorm 1' in .DOC format (41,472 bytes).

Vorm 2XLS
Vorm 2 - Tehniline kirjeldus_hinnajaotustabel... -- 31.4 KB

This document is a fillable form containing a technical description and price breakdown table, where the bidder must complete the yellow cells with unit prices that will be fixed for the entire framework agreement period, and consider the contracting authority's preference for medicinal products with marketing authorization.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306019_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 37.8 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and methodology, primarily based on the lowest 24-month estimated cost without taxes.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306019_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.9 KB

This document is an explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) detailing the contracting authority's conditions and requirements for the tender, serving as a guide for bidders to understand qualification criteria and exclusion grounds, but it is not to be filled out directly.

AlusdokumendidDOC
Alusdokumendid.docx -- 45.6 KB

These base documents provide an overview of the general conditions of the public procurement, the e-procurement process, rules for submitting offers, and refer to important appendices and forms.

Müügilepingu projektDOC
Müügilepingu projekt.docx -- 37.0 KB

This document is a draft sales contract outlining the terms for the purchase of medicines by Lääne-Tallinna Keskhaigla and other hospitals from the successful tenderer, based on the tender documents and the bidder's offer.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

76
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender is generally well-structured and transparent, but it presents a significant inconsistency between the stated procedure type and the allowance for negotiation, which requires clarification. It provides comprehensive documentation and clear evaluation criteria.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami70/100

The deadlines are reasonable, and references to ESPD and EU sanctions are present. However, the primary concern is the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic listed for an 'Open Procedure' (Type A), which is contradictory and could lead to legal challenges or confusion regarding the procurement process.

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' (Type A) and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Przejrzystość85/100

The description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are generally clear and understandable. Documentation is comprehensive, including specific forms and a draft contract. A minor ambiguity arises from the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic conflicting with the stated procedure type.

Slight ambiguity due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Kompletność80/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration (24 months) are all specified. Documents are attached, and requirements are defined. However, the NUTS code is missing, and the explicit delivery location is not detailed in the basic information, though implied by the organization and contract.

Missing NUTS code.
Explicit delivery location not detailed in basic information.
Uczciwość90/100

Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criteria (lowest cost) are objective and transparent. Electronic submission is enabled, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. The tender being 'Divided into Parts' also promotes fair competition.

Praktyczność80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the duration is clearly specified as 24 months. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly in the basic info, this is often determined post-award. Financing conditions refer to the contract, which is provided.

Contract start date not explicitly stated in basic information.
Spójność danych70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The significant inconsistency lies in the 'Type: A' (Open Procedure) being listed alongside 'Negotiation Allowed', which represents a fundamental contradiction in the procurement process definition.

Inconsistency between procedure type ('Open Procedure') and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Zrównoważony rozwój30/100

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information or AI summaries. The tender is not specified as EU funded.

Absence of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Mocne strony

Clear financial requirements and objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost).
Comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and specific forms.
High transparency with disclosed value and electronic submission.
Reasonable submission deadline and tender divided into parts.
E-procurement enabled for equal access.

Wątpliwości

Significant inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed', requiring urgent clarification.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Missing NUTS code and explicit delivery location in the basic information.

Rekomendacje

1. Clarify the procedure type and whether negotiation is truly permitted, ensuring consistency with national procurement regulations.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where feasible, even for medical supplies, to align with modern procurement best practices.
3. Ensure all standard fields like NUTS code and explicit delivery location are populated for full completeness.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u