Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login23 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
9 documents available with AI summaries
The bidder must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents, provide necessary data for contract signing, power of attorney (if applicable), a trial work, team details, and information about authorized persons, as well as declare trade secrets.
Bidders must submit a CV form demonstrating team member compliance with requirements, including at least one full-stack software developer.
The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the quality of a trial task (70% weight) and the hourly rate of a full-stack software developer (30% weight), where the lowest hourly rate receives maximum points.
The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.
The Information System Authority is seeking a single bidder to perform administrative tasks for Bürokrati base software and language technology solutions, including regular updates, critical vulnerability fixes, and client support.
This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, where a trial task and the cost of a full-stack software developer's hour are the main criteria for determining the successful bidder.
The trial work assesses the bidder's technical capability in managing and developing Bürokrati components, focusing on updating the Java version.
This framework agreement defines the terms for ordering administrative works for Bürokrati base software and language technology solutions by the Information System Authority, including updates, security fixes, and customer support.
The tender covers administrative work for Bürokrati core software and language technology solutions, including updates, security fixes, and client support, executed using agile methodologies.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for administrative works of Bürokrati software is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed financial information.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure type (A) and framework agreement type (WITHOUT_REOPENING_COMPETITION) are specified. No disputes are indicated. The duration and validity periods are logical.
The description of the administrative works for Bürokrati software and language technology solutions is clear. Technical requirements, such as regular updates, security fixes, and client assistance, are well-defined. The evaluation criteria, focusing on a trial task and hourly rate, are explicitly stated.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. Key documents like the contract template, trial work specifications, and CV requirements are attached. However, detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is not provided.
The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criteria are objective, based on a weighted score of a practical work sample and hourly rate. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated. The requirement for a single bidder for administrative tasks is justified by the need for efficiency and cost savings, which is a reasonable argument, though it limits competition.
The tender mandates electronic submission and e-procurement. The contract duration is specified. However, specific details regarding the contract start date and comprehensive financing information are not readily available in the provided text, impacting the practicality score.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.
The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement' as characteristics. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation as part of the evaluation or requirements. This limits the sustainability score.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required