Cybersecurity Training and Exercise Package (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

This tender for cybersecurity training and exercises in Bosnia and Herzegovina is well-structured and legally compliant, but lacks explicit contract duration and sustainability considerations. Its electronic nature and clear requirements contribute to a fair and transparent process.

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and no reported disputes. The use of ESPD and electronic submission, along with explicit EU sanctions compliance, aligns with modern procurement regulations.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. Evaluation criteria (60% price, 40% quality) are explicitly stated in Document 3, despite an automated flag to the contrary. Technical specifications and a draft contract are provided, enhancing clarity.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines, is present. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined across various documents. However, the explicit contract duration is not readily available in the basic information or AI summaries, which is a notable omission. The NUTS code is also missing.

The tender exhibits high fairness, with full document access, disclosed estimated value, and a reasonable preparation period. Evaluation criteria are objective (price/quality split), and e-procurement ensures equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are fully supported, and a document URL is provided for access. However, the contract's specific start date and duration are not explicitly stated in the readily available information, which could pose practical challenges for bidders in planning.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor discrepancy exists with the automated check regarding evaluation criteria, which is contradicted by a document summary, but overall data integrity is good.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement principles, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a missed opportunity for broader impact.