Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login23 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
10 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including requirements for joint tenderers, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of tender compliance with basic documents, and the structure for presenting the tender cost.
This document is a tender cost form requiring the bidder to provide company details and unit prices for the outdoor gym equipment, along with the total cost.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the outdoor gym equipment tender, where the offer's cost, including delivery, installation, and 60 months of maintenance service, constitutes 100% of the evaluation weight, and the lowest price receives maximum points.
This document serves as an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions, which bidders must complete electronically, and is not a form to be filled out directly.
This document provides instructions for tenderers on the procurement of outdoor gym equipment with installation and maintenance services, detailing general conditions, bidder requirements, and submission procedures.
This tender involves the purchase and installation of 16 outdoor gym equipment units at five locations in Tallinn, along with a five-year monthly maintenance and on-demand repair service.
This draft procurement contract outlines the terms for the purchase, installation, and maintenance of 16 outdoor gym equipment units, to be concluded with the successful tenderer.
This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, authorizing one partner to submit the tender and perform procurement-related actions on behalf of the other joint tenderers.
This form is for the tenderer to confirm the use of subcontractors for the public procurement contract, provide their details, and confirm that subcontractors are not subject to exclusion grounds.
This document is a third-party consent form allowing a tenderer to rely on their data (resources, measures, specialists) for qualification, while also assuming joint and several liability for contract execution.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender provides a clear scope and comprehensive documentation but is severely undermined by critical data inconsistencies regarding the procurement threshold and evaluation criteria, posing significant legal and fairness risks. While practical aspects are well-addressed, these fundamental contradictions require immediate clarification to ensure a fair and compliant process.
The tender exhibits critical legal compliance issues due to conflicting information regarding the procurement threshold ('Over Sum Limit: No' vs. 'exceeds public procurement threshold') and contradictory evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% lowest price'). These inconsistencies create uncertainty about the applicable legal framework and evaluation methodology, which is a fundamental flaw. The CPV code is also too broad.
The description of the scope and technical requirements is clear. However, the direct contradiction in the evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price) creates significant ambiguity for bidders, making it unclear how their proposals will be assessed. This severely impacts the overall clarity of the tender process.
The tender provides most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration. A comprehensive set of documents and forms is listed. However, the financial information is somewhat inconsistent ('Value Classified: Yes' despite a stated value, and the threshold contradiction), slightly detracting from full completeness.
Fairness is significantly compromised by the contradictory evaluation criteria, which prevent bidders from understanding the true basis of award. The ambiguity regarding the procurement threshold also creates an uneven playing field, as bidders may be unsure of the applicable rules. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.
The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. A document URL for the opening place is provided, and the contract duration is clearly specified. The lack of an explicit contract start date is a minor omission.
This category scores very low due to multiple critical inconsistencies. The most severe are the contradictions regarding whether the tender exceeds the national procurement threshold and the conflicting statements on evaluation criteria. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a stated value also adds to the inconsistency.
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus in its requirements or evaluation criteria. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability considerations.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required