Purchase of inventory for Sillamäe athletics and football stadium

This tender is generally well-structured, offering clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, but it significantly lacks explicit sustainability aspects. The documentation is comprehensive, supporting a fair and practical procurement process.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable submission deadlines, clearly defined procedure type, and appropriate CPV codes. It references national procurement acts and is EU-funded, indicating adherence to regulations. No disputes or suspensions were detected. A minor ambiguity exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being disclosed.

Clarity is a strong point of this tender. The description is unambiguous, requirements are well-documented and understandable, and evaluation criteria (100% cost, lowest price wins) are explicitly stated. Performance conditions and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and clear.

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic, financial, timeline, and classification information. A total of 15 documents are attached, most with detailed summaries, ensuring bidders have comprehensive information. Requirements and criteria are thoroughly defined.

Fairness is well-addressed, with full document access, disclosed estimated value, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. The tender supports e-procurement for equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. The justification for not dividing the tender into parts is provided and seems reasonable for a comprehensive project.

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and providing a clear e-procurement system URL. The contract start date is known, and financing information is exceptionally detailed. However, the specific contract duration is not explicitly stated in the basic information, though it is likely covered in the draft contract.

Data consistency is generally high, with all key fields populated and logical dates. No suspensions or disputes are reported. The minor inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified: Yes' versus the disclosed estimated value is present but does not significantly hinder overall consistency.

This category is a significant weakness. The tender explicitly lacks any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as confirmed by automated checks. While EU-funded, this project does not integrate sustainability criteria into its requirements.