Purchase of medical instrument disinfection agents RE-TENDER

This tender for medical instrument disinfection agents is generally well-structured and transparent, leveraging e-procurement and clear evaluation criteria. While it exhibits strong adherence to core procurement principles, minor details like the NUTS code and explicit contract start date are missing, and there's a notable contradiction in the automated system's flagging of evaluation criteria.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines (35 days), appropriate CPV codes, and adherence to EU sanctions and WTO/GPA principles. The use of ESPD aligns with modern procurement practices. However, the NUTS code is missing, and the specific procedure name (beyond 'Type A') could be more explicit.

The tender description is clear, and requirements for eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are well-documented, largely through the ESPD and specific forms. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest price. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines, is provided. The contract duration is clearly stated in the description ('until 10.05.2029'). All required forms and a draft contract are included. The main omission is the NUTS code.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, price-based evaluation criteria. Electronic submission and e-procurement ensure equal access, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company.

The tender supports electronic submission and provides the e-procurement portal link. Financing conditions are referenced in the provided draft contract, and the contract end date is clear. However, the specific contract start date is not explicitly stated, which could be a minor practical detail for planning.

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The significant inconsistency lies in the automated system flagging 'No evaluation criteria specified' while the tender documents and AI-extracted requirements clearly define them. This suggests an issue with the automated check rather than the tender's internal consistency.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is common for commodity procurements but results in a neutral score for sustainability. It is not EU-funded.