Tenders

Paint repair work for the wind turbine towers of Virtsu II wind farm

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304956
Value
€40,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 21, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Tender price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 21, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€40,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
77
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to order paint repair work for the three wind turbine towers of the Virtsu II wind farm. More detailed requirements for the work are in the base document "Technical description", and the terms of the procurement contract are in the base document "Draft contract".
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the tender price using "Form 1. Tender price".
--Submit the bid no later than 2026-03-03 at 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not fall under mandatory exclusion grounds as specified in § 88 (2) of the Public Procurement Act or equivalent grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Confirm the compliance of the bid with the stated conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Possess at least two technicians with certificates for working at heights.
--Be capable of performing paint repair works on wind turbine towers at Virtsu II wind farm.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a tender price, which will be the sole evaluation criterion (100% weight, lowest price receives maximum points).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304956_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.5 KB

This document outlines the tender submission conditions, requiring confirmation of offer compliance, the availability of at least two technicians with valid height work certificates, and the submission of the tender price using "Form 1. Tender price".

Form 1. Tender priceXLS
Form 1 Tender price.xlsx -- 21.1 KB

This is a tender price form for paint repair and optional non-destructive testing services for wind turbine towers at Virtsu II wind farm, which must be completed by the tenderer.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304956_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document specifies that bids for the Virtsu II wind farm wind turbine tower paint repair works tender will be evaluated 100% based on the tender price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

77
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for wind turbine tower paint repair works is generally well-structured and clear, demonstrating good legal compliance and fairness in its requirements and evaluation. However, the lack of detailed content analysis for key documents and absence of sustainability considerations present areas for improvement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (VO), assigns an appropriate CPV code, and references national procurement law (§ 88 (2) of the Public Procurement Act), indicating good adherence to legal frameworks. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.

Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the procurement's objective and explicitly states that evaluation will be 100% based on the lowest price. AI-extracted requirements are well-defined and understandable, with further details directed to specific documents.

Completeness70/100

While all basic information, deadlines, and financial details are present, the inability to analyze the content of critical documents like 'Technical description' and 'Draft contract' (due to .zip format) limits a full assessment of the tender's completeness regarding detailed scope and contractual terms from the provided data.

Content of 'Technical description' and 'Draft contract' not analyzed due to .zip format.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through objective evaluation criteria (lowest price), reasonable and generic technical requirements (e.g., certified technicians for working at heights), and the enablement of electronic submission and e-procurement for equal access. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a clear contract start date is provided. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main overview, and financing conditions are only referenced to an unanalyzed document, slightly impacting the immediate practicality of information.

Contract duration not explicitly stated in the main tender overview.
Financing conditions are in an unanalyzed document.
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. A minor inconsistency exists where the estimated value is disclosed, but the field 'Value Classified' is marked 'Yes', which is contradictory.

Contradiction: 'Estimated Value' is disclosed, but 'Value Classified' is marked 'Yes'.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which typically correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Good legal compliance with national procurement regulations.
Reasonable and generic technical capability requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Transparent estimated value and contract start date.

Concerns

Critical documents ('Technical description', 'Draft contract') were not analyzed due to .zip format, limiting full assessment.
Contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main tender overview.
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Minor data inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified' despite value disclosure.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in easily analyzable formats (e.g., PDF) for comprehensive review.
2. Clearly state the contract duration in the main tender overview for improved clarity.
3. Consider incorporating relevant sustainability or social clauses where applicable for future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline