Design of route selection for Pärna 110 kV substation entries

This tender for the design of the Pärna 110 kV substation entry routes demonstrates high quality with clear requirements, objective evaluation criteria, and robust legal compliance. While comprehensive, the lack of explicit sustainability criteria and a minor data inconsistency are noted.

The tender exhibits strong legal compliance, with clearly defined procedures, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes or suspensions. Mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are standard, and GDPR compliance is explicitly mentioned, aligning with national and EU regulations. The 25-day submission period is reasonable.

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the scope of design work. Requirements are well-structured and understandable, categorized into exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as the lowest price, ensuring transparency. Performance conditions are clearly referenced to the draft contract.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is comprehensively provided. The tender lists 13 documents, covering all necessary aspects from technical specifications to contract drafts and submission forms, indicating a complete set of tender documentation.

Fairness is excellent, with the estimated value clearly disclosed and evaluation based solely on the lowest price, ensuring objectivity. Electronic submission and e-procurement facilitate equal access. Requirements for key personnel, while specific, appear justified for the specialized nature of 110 kV substation design and do not suggest tailoring to a specific company.

The tender supports electronic submission and clearly specifies the contract duration and financing information. While a direct document URL is not provided in the summary and an explicit contract start date is absent, these are minor points given the overall clarity and accessibility through an e-procurement system.

Data consistency is generally good, with logical dates and no detected suspensions or disputes. However, there is a minor inconsistency where 'Value Classified: Yes' is stated alongside an explicit 'Estimated Value: 50,000.00 EUR'.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is common for purely technical design services but indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.