Design and construction works for Peetri school kindergarten

This tender for Peetri School kindergarten design and construction works is generally well-structured and transparent, benefiting from EU funding and green procurement principles. However, it presents minor data inconsistencies and lacks explicit social and innovation criteria.

The tender generally appears legally compliant, utilizing standard forms like ESPD and electronic submission. The main ambiguity is the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic alongside 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure), which typically does not involve negotiation in its standard form. The disclosure of estimated value despite 'Value Classified: Yes' is a minor data inconsistency but not a legal non-compliance.

The tender is generally clear. The description is concise, requirements are well-structured, and evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as lowest price. AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview.

The tender provides all essential basic information, financial details, and timeline. A good number of supporting documents are attached, covering legal, technical, and contractual aspects. The AI's inability to process certain file formats (XML, ASICE, DWG) is a technical limitation, not a deficiency in the tender's completeness from the contracting authority's side.

The tender appears fair. Full documentation is available, the estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. Electronic submission ensures equal access. Requirements for personnel qualifications are standard for construction projects and do not appear tailored.

Electronic submission is supported, and duration is clear. The contract start date is not explicitly in the basic info but would be in the contract draft. Financing is mentioned as EU funded and specified in the contract, which is practical. The lack of a direct document URL in the provided data (only the opening place URL) is a minor point.

Most data fields are populated and consistent. The main inconsistencies are the 'Value Classified' flag contradicting the disclosed value and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic conflicting with the 'Open Procedure' type. These are notable but not critical enough to severely impact the tender's viability.

The tender explicitly targets green procurement and is EU funded, which is positive. However, it lacks explicit social criteria and innovation focus, as confirmed by automated checks. For an EU-funded project, integrating social and innovation aspects is often encouraged or even expected.