Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login22 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses such as money laundering and human trafficking.
This document outlines mandatory tender submission conditions, such as site visits, specific price breakdown and cost structure requirements, and details the qualification criteria for the bidder's responsible specialists, including the construction manager and strong current specialist.
This price distribution table is a form where bidders must submit a detailed breakdown of their tender price by various cost types and unit prices for the Kuressaare Hospital E-wing construction project.
Bidders must provide details of a construction project manager who meets specific professional qualification and at least 7 years of work experience requirements, including managing similar (preferably healthcare-related) construction projects.
This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for the Kuressaare Hospital E-wing construction tender is the cost of construction works, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.
This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria that companies must confirm electronically.
This document provides general information about the Kuressaare Hospital E-wing construction tender, including project scope, deadlines, and instructions for preparing and submitting bids via the e-RHR system, while referring to the tender notice for specific qualification requirements.
This document outlines the technical requirements for the construction of the Kuressaare Hospital E-wing, including demolition, building a new wing and external area, quality standards, warranty conditions, and project documentation.
This draft contract outlines the scope, timeline, payment terms, and obligations for the construction of the Kuressaare Hospital E-wing, to be signed with the successful bidder.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for the construction of Kuressaare Hospital's E-wing exhibits significant inconsistencies, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and CPV codes, which pose legal and fairness risks. While it includes positive aspects like electronic submission and sustainability focus, critical ambiguities need immediate rectification.
The tender has several legal compliance issues. The CPV code '5992' is invalid; the correct 8-digit code for hospital construction should be used. There is a direct contradiction in the stated evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest price is sole criterion'). The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag for a disclosed 12.5M EUR estimated value is confusing and potentially non-compliant with transparency requirements for a tender of this size, especially given it's EU funded. The 'Over Sum Limit: No' statement for 12.5M EUR is questionable against EU thresholds for works contracts.
Clarity is severely impacted by the fundamental contradiction in the evaluation criteria. Bidders are presented with conflicting information on how their proposals will be assessed ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. 'lowest price is sole criterion' in requirements and a document). This ambiguity is a critical flaw that can lead to confusion, incorrect bids, or legal challenges.
The tender provides a comprehensive set of documents, including technical specifications, draft contract, and submission forms. However, the completeness of clear and unambiguous information is compromised by the inconsistencies in evaluation criteria and the 'Value Classified' status, which leaves critical aspects unclear.
Fairness is significantly undermined by the contradictory evaluation criteria, which prevents equal treatment and transparency for all bidders. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, if it implies actual classification despite the value being shown, also raises transparency concerns. While the justification for not dividing into lots is provided, the mandatory site visit could pose a barrier for some bidders, and the 'preferably healthcare-related' experience for the construction manager is slightly restrictive.
The tender demonstrates good practical aspects, including electronic submission via the e-RHR system, clear contract start and duration dates, and explicit mention of EU funding. The provision of a document URL for the opening place is also helpful. The mandatory site visit, while common for complex construction, is a minor practical hurdle.
Data consistency is very poor due to multiple critical contradictions. The CPV code is invalid. The evaluation criteria are stated contradictorily. The tender simultaneously states 'Value Classified: Yes' and provides an 'Estimated Value'. Furthermore, 'Over Sum Limit: No' for a 12.5M EUR EU-funded project is inconsistent with typical EU thresholds. These inconsistencies are fundamental and problematic.
The tender scores well on sustainability, explicitly stating 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics. Being 'EU Funded' often implies adherence to higher sustainability standards. The only minor detractor is the automated check indicating 'No innovation focus'.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required