Legal Compliance100/100
The tender notice, in its current form, raises significant legal compliance concerns. The absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and evaluation criteria directly undermines principles of transparency, equal treatment, and proportionality, making it impossible for bidders to understand the full legal framework of the procurement.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Absence of eligibility requirements.
Clarity40/100
The description of the required employee benefits and the technical service requirements are generally clear and well-articulated. However, the overall clarity of the procurement process is severely compromised by the lack of any attached tender documents, leaving bidders without crucial information on how to prepare and submit a compliant bid.
•Overall procurement process is unclear due to missing tender documents.
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. Key components such as full tender documents (Instructions to Bidders, Scope of Work, Terms and Conditions, Draft Contract), detailed evaluation criteria, and explicit financial requirements are entirely missing. This renders the notice insufficient for potential bidders to formulate a proper response.
•No tender documents attached.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The fairness of the tender is severely compromised. Without evaluation criteria, bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be assessed, leading to a lack of transparency and potential for arbitrary decisions. The requirement for bidders to provide 'all services listed' might also unduly restrict competition to larger, multi-service providers or consortia, potentially limiting participation from specialized firms.
•Absence of evaluation criteria undermines transparency and equal treatment.
•Requirement to provide 'all services listed' could be restrictive, potentially limiting competition.
Practicality40/100
From a practical standpoint, it is impossible for potential bidders to prepare and submit a compliant and competitive bid based solely on the provided notice. The absence of any tender documents means bidders lack essential information regarding the scope, terms, conditions, and submission process, making a practical response unfeasible.
•Bidders cannot practically respond without full tender documents.
Data Consistency100/100
There is a significant inconsistency between the tender's title and description ('Employee Benefits and Services') and its assigned CPV code ('Parcel transport services'). This fundamental error could lead to the tender being overlooked by relevant suppliers and seen by irrelevant ones.
•Major inconsistency between tender description and CPV code.
Sustainability25/100
While the tender mentions an 'Innovation Focus,' there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to environmental sustainability (green procurement) or social aspects (e.g., fair labor practices, local community benefits) detailed in the provided text. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.
•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Lack of explicit social criteria.