Latvia8 days leftOpen

Development of explanatory memorandum and construction for improving water tourism infrastructure sites in Carnikava

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Pieriga, Latvia

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

February 10, 2026 at 10:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

45000000

REFERENCE

163939

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Development of explanatory memorandum and construction for improving water tourism infrastructure sites in Carnikava
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidders must meet mandatory exclusion criteria as detailed in the tender documents. (Specific criteria are not detailed in the provided summaries.)

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bidding company must be legally registered.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must demonstrate previous experience with floating structures.
  • Bidders must provide a qualified designer.
  • Bidders must provide a qualified work manager.
  • Bidders must be capable of developing an explanatory memorandum and performing construction works for water tourism infrastructure improvements in Carnikava.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided summaries.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Proposals must be submitted by February 10, 2026, 10:00:00.
  • Bidders must submit all necessary supporting documents as specified in the tender.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija
technical_spec163939_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260120121320.pdf107.5 KB
Summary:
This document contains the mandatory exclusion and selection criteria for bidders in a procurement for improving water tourism infrastructure in Carnikava, detailing requirements for registration, previous experience with floating structures, and qualifications of key personnel (designer, work manager), along with the necessary supporting documents for submission.
ZIP
Nolikums ar pielikumiem
technical_spec6.pielikums_Tehniska_specifikacija.zip2.7 MB
Summary:
This document contains land registry extracts for properties at Jomas iela 7 and Laivu iela 2 in Carnikava, alongside a technical specification for the design and construction of water tourism infrastructure improvements in Carnikava.
HTM
Main tender page
tender_noticeindex.html
Summary:
This document contains basic data for procurement ĀNP 2026/06, detailing an open competition for the development of an explanatory memorandum and construction works to improve water tourism infrastructure in Carnikava, Latvia, with a proposal submission deadline of February 10, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for water tourism infrastructure improvements in Carnikava presents a mixed quality, with clear basic information but significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness due to restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to standard legal procedures, with a reasonable submission period and clear classification. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, potentially violating principles of transparency and equal treatment.

Restricted document access
Clarity60/100

While the project description and basic requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. The lack of detailed financial requirements also contributes to this.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific financial requirements detailed in summaries
Completeness65/100

Most essential information is provided, including basic details, timelines, and key requirements. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the missing evaluation criteria represent notable gaps in completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness40/100

The 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' are severe fairness issues, undermining transparency and equal treatment. The undisclosed value also hinders fair competition. The requirement for floating structures experience is specific but likely justified by the project nature.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality60/100

Practicality is hampered by the 'Restricted document access' and a contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. 'No e-submission' flag). A specific contract start date is also not provided.

Restricted document access
Contradiction regarding e-submission support
Data Consistency75/100

Most data fields are populated and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission', along with the missing estimated value and evaluation criteria, indicates some inconsistencies.

Contradiction regarding e-submission support
Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity for broader sustainability integration.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and basic information
Reasonable submission deadline (21 days)
EU Funded and WTO/GPA characteristics
Clear definition of procedure type and CPV code
No reported disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Restricted document access, severely impacting transparency
Missing evaluation criteria, hindering fair competition and clarity
Estimated contract value not disclosed
Contradiction regarding e-submission support
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders to uphold transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to allow bidders to prepare competitive proposals and ensure objective assessment.
3. Disclose the estimated contract value to provide bidders with a clearer understanding of the project's scope and financial expectations.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
62/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes