Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type under the new Procurement Act 2023 and uses an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, and specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed, which are minor disclosure gaps.
•Missing reveal date
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Clarity70/100
The project description is highly clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-articulated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
The tender includes all essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and location. Four documents are attached. The primary completeness issues are the lack of defined evaluation criteria and the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Fairness50/100
The tender discloses the estimated value and provides document access, with requirements appearing generic. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria creates a significant fairness concern, as it introduces subjectivity into the assessment process. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The main practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which can hinder efficiency and accessibility for bidders.
Data Consistency90/100
The tender exhibits good data consistency regarding dates and the absence of disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure,' along with the missing reveal date.
•Liable Person field empty
•Missing Type/Procedure codes
Sustainability50/100
While the project's objective of urban regeneration inherently carries social and economic sustainability benefits (creating a place to live, work, and play), the tender documentation does not explicitly include green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus in its requirements.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria explicitly stated