Riga, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 03, 2026 at 10:00
Other
163863
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for construction supervision in Riga exhibits significant transparency and accessibility issues due to restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, severely impacting fairness and legal compliance despite otherwise clear basic information.
While the procedure type, CPV codes, and deadlines appear compliant, the critical issue of "Restricted document access" poses a severe risk to legal compliance, violating fundamental principles of transparency and equal treatment in public procurement.
The tender's description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear. However, the stated "lowest price" evaluation criterion is contradicted by flags indicating "Missing evaluation criteria," suggesting a lack of detailed assessment methodology for technical proposals, which reduces overall clarity.
Basic information like title, organization, and duration is complete. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and "Restricted document access" significantly hinders the completeness of information available to potential bidders. The failed summary for one document also indicates a gap.
Fairness is severely compromised by "Restricted document access" and the undisclosed estimated value, preventing equal access to information and hindering bidders' ability to prepare competitive proposals. While "E-Procurement" is stated, its effectiveness is undermined.
Despite "E-Procurement" being listed, "Restricted document access" creates a major practical barrier for potential bidders. The absence of a specific contract start date and financing details (due to undisclosed value) also reduces the tender's overall practicality.
Most core data fields are consistent and logical, particularly dates. However, the contradiction between "E-Procurement" and "Restricted document access," alongside the ambiguity regarding the completeness of evaluation criteria, indicates some data consistency issues.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes