Development and implementation of the project for the replacement of main engines and gearboxes of PKE vessel KA-14 ASTRA

This tender exhibits significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness, primarily due to restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and conflicting information about evaluation criteria. While basic legal compliance and structure are present, critical gaps hinder a fair and clear procurement process.

The tender generally complies with basic legal requirements, featuring a clear open procedure, reasonable submission deadline, and relevant CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced. However, the undisclosed estimated value, while not explicitly a legal breach if permitted for this type of procurement, reduces transparency.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are structured to be detailed in a separate document. However, the critical flag indicating 'Missing evaluation criteria' is a major concern, as it prevents bidders from understanding how their offers will be assessed, severely impacting the clarity of the process.

Basic information, documents, duration, and location are provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and the flagged absence of clear evaluation criteria, which are fundamental components for a comprehensive tender.

Fairness is severely compromised by 'Restricted document access', the 'Value not disclosed', and the flagged 'Missing evaluation criteria'. These issues create significant barriers to equal opportunity and transparency, making it difficult for all potential bidders to prepare competitive offers. While e-procurement is indicated, these fundamental flaws overshadow its positive impact.

Electronic submission appears to be supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, 'Restricted document access' presents a major practical hurdle for bidders. The absence of a specific contract start date and detailed financing information also reduces the overall practicality for planning and bid preparation.

While dates are logical and no disputes are reported, there are significant contradictions within the provided data. Specifically, the flag for 'Missing evaluation criteria' directly conflicts with the document summary stating their presence. Additionally, 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic, but 'No e-submission' is flagged as an issue. The undisclosed estimated value also represents a data gap.

The tender shows no explicit focus on sustainability, lacking criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.