Newark Market Place Refurbishment

This tender, currently in preliminary market engagement, provides a clear project description and invites market input, but lacks specific requirements and evaluation criteria for the formal procurement phase.

The tender is in a planning/preliminary market engagement phase, which explains the absence of a defined procedure type. CPV codes are appropriately assigned, and there are no disputes. The timeline for this preliminary stage is reasonable. However, the lack of a defined procedure type is a future concern for formal compliance.

The project description and the purpose of the preliminary market engagement are clear. It is explicitly stated that detailed requirements and evaluation criteria will be provided in the formal tender, which is clear for this stage. However, the absence of these details for the actual procurement means future clarity is needed.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, estimated value, duration, and location (NUTS code) is complete. Documents are attached. However, critical details for the actual procurement, including specific requirements and evaluation criteria, are explicitly stated as missing at this preliminary stage.

The preliminary market engagement actively invites input, especially from SMEs, which promotes fairness and broad participation. Document access is provided, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of e-submission and unspecified evaluation criteria for the formal tender could impact future fairness.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of e-submission support is a significant practical drawback for potential bidders and modern procurement practices. Document URLs are not explicitly provided, though documents are listed.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside an explicitly stated estimated value is a minor inconsistency, as are the empty 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. The tender is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.