Legal Compliance35/100
The tender lacks a defined procedure type and mandatory disclosure requirements such as eligibility and exclusion grounds. The explicit statement about a single supplier (Raith) raises significant concerns about compliance with principles of transparency and equal treatment, potentially indicating a direct award justification rather than a competitive tender.
•Undefined procedure type
•Missing mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds
Clarity65/100
The technical description of the required system is highly detailed and unambiguous, clearly outlining the performance conditions. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness45/100
While basic information like title, organization, value, and duration are present, critical components of a complete tender are missing. These include the procurement procedure type, comprehensive eligibility and exclusion criteria, and crucially, the evaluation criteria for bids.
•Missing procedure type
•Missing eligibility and exclusion requirements
Fairness15/100
This category scores very low due to the explicit statement in the description that the contracting authority believes only one supplier (Raith) can meet the combined requirements. This directly undermines the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Furthermore, the absence of objective evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission capabilities limit fair access and competition.
•Requirements explicitly tailored to a single supplier (Raith)
•No objective and transparent evaluation criteria
Practicality55/100
The tender provides clear contract start and duration dates, and the value is disclosed. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.
•No electronic submission supported
Data Consistency65/100
Key fields such as 'Type' and 'Procedure' are unpopulated, and critical criteria are missing, which indicates gaps in the data provided. However, the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and consistent with each other.
•Key fields (Type, Procedure) are unpopulated
•Missing critical criteria (eligibility, exclusion, evaluation)
Sustainability15/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation-focused criteria. While the system itself is high-tech, the procurement process does not actively seek or reward sustainable or innovative solutions from bidders.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social aspects considered