BBC0226 Goffs Lane and Hammond Street Playing Fields Drainage Works

This tender demonstrates good clarity and adherence to basic procurement principles, but is significantly hampered by inaccessible documentation, which raises concerns about completeness and fairness. There is also a notable absence of sustainability criteria.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and no disputes are reported. The submission period is reasonable. However, the summary's lack of explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and missing codes for the procedure type are minor points for improvement.

The project description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-defined. Evaluation criteria (60% price, 40% quality) are clearly specified. Performance conditions are not detailed in the summaries.

While basic information, financial details, and timeline are complete, the inaccessibility of two out of five listed tender documents ('Page not found', 'Download failed') is a critical deficiency, preventing full access to necessary bidding information.

The tender provides transparent evaluation criteria, discloses the estimated value, and supports e-procurement. Requirements appear generic. However, the inability to access all tender documents creates a significant barrier to equal access and fair competition.

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are specified. The primary practical hurdle is the inaccessibility of some tender documents, which complicates the bidding process for potential suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for the tender type and procedure.

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects (beyond the project's public health goal), or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded.