Tenders

Procurement of environmental landscaping works at VILNIUS TECH near buildings S3 and S5, Saulėtekio al. 11, Vilnius (SAK)

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6625140
Value
€380,000
Location
Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€380,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Lithuania
Type
Other
55
Quality Score/100
Fair
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of environmental landscaping works at VILNIUS TECH near buildings S3 and S5, Saulėtekio al. 11, Vilnius (SAK)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (4)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-06 10:00:00.
--The tenderer will need to submit all required documents confirming compliance with qualification and technical requirements.
--The tenderer will need to submit a price proposal.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS4
--The tenderer must not be bankrupt, in liquidation, have its activities suspended, or be subject to bankruptcy proceedings.
--The tenderer must not have been convicted of serious crimes related to professional ethics, fraud, corruption, money laundering, or terrorism.
--The tenderer must not have committed grave professional misconduct.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tenderer must be registered and legally entitled to perform activities related to landscaping works.
--The tenderer must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer will need to demonstrate experience in carrying out landscaping works of a similar nature and scope.
--The tenderer will need to provide information on available specialists and their qualifications required for the works.
--The tenderer will need to demonstrate possession of the necessary equipment and technical resources to perform the works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer will need to demonstrate financial stability and capacity to execute the contract (e.g., annual turnover, insurance).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

TS priedas 1DOC
2.1. priedas TS Priekine teritorija DKZ 2026-...

This document contains an appendix to the technical specifications, detailing work quantities, specific materials, and technical requirements for landscaping items like luminaires, lighting poles, and power outlet cabinets for the VILNIUS TECH S3 building.

TSDOC
2 priedas TS S3 Aplinkotvarkos pirkimo objekt...

This document contains the technical specification for landscaping works at VILNIUS TECH's S3 and S5 buildings, detailing the scope of work, contractor requirements, green procurement criteria, and project timelines.

Sutarties projektasDOC
Aplinkos tvarkymo sutarties projektas 2026-02...

This document contains a draft contract for environmental landscaping works at VILNIUS TECH, outlining the project scope, fixed price, payment terms including direct payments to subcontractors, and a 4-month completion timeline.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.6 KB

No content extracted

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a container file (likely a ZIP) embedding an ESPD request in both XML and PDF formats, which bidders typically need to fill out.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.6 KB

This document contains an ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) request, outlining the exclusion and selection criteria for a tender, which bidders must use as a template to provide information about their suitability.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

55
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a mixed quality, with clear basic information and a defined procedure, but suffers from significant deficiencies in clarity and completeness regarding requirements and evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance65/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and references the EU directive (2014/24/ES), and CPV codes are appropriately assigned. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the absence of a reveal date and, critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant transparency and compliance issues.

Missing reveal date for the tender.
No evaluation criteria specified, which is a critical transparency and legal compliance requirement.
Clarity45/100

While the tender title and description are clear, the AI-extracted requirements for eligibility, financial, technical, and submission are all empty. This indicates a severe lack of clarity in presenting essential information to potential bidders. The explicit absence of evaluation criteria further compounds this issue.

AI-extracted requirements are all empty, indicating a lack of clear and structured requirements.
No evaluation criteria specified, making it unclear how bids will be assessed.
Completeness55/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete regarding detailed requirements, with all AI-extracted categories being empty. The NUTS code and liable person are also missing, and evaluation criteria are not defined.

AI-extracted requirements (eligibility, financial, technical, submission) are all empty.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Fairness45/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value, and e-procurement is indicated. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as bidders cannot understand the objective basis for selection. The lack of specific, clearly stated requirements also creates uncertainty.

No evaluation criteria specified, which is a critical barrier to fair and objective assessment of bids.
Empty AI-extracted requirements create uncertainty for bidders.
Practicality55/100

The tender specifies 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive for practicality. However, the automated check flags 'No e-submission', creating a contradiction that could hinder practical application. The contract start date is not explicitly known, though duration is specified.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag.
Contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency65/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are generally logical. However, the missing NUTS code, empty liable person field, the contradiction regarding e-submission, and the unreadable 'README.txt' document indicate inconsistencies and gaps in the provided data.

Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality.
Missing NUTS code and liable person.
Sustainability60/100

The technical specifications document explicitly mentions 'green procurement requirements including environmental management system standards', which is a positive aspect. However, the tender lacks explicit social criteria or an innovation focus, and it is not identified as EU funded.

No explicit social criteria mentioned.
No innovation focus identified.

Strengths

Clear title and description of the procurement.
Estimated value and contract duration are specified.
Procedure type is clearly defined and references EU directive.
Includes green procurement requirements in technical specifications.
Full document access is provided.

Concerns

Critical absence of clearly specified evaluation criteria.
AI-extracted requirements (eligibility, financial, technical, submission) are all empty.
Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality.
Missing reveal date and NUTS code.
Lack of explicit social and innovation aspects in sustainability.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly define and publish all evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for bidders.
2. Ensure all mandatory requirements (eligibility, financial, technical, submission) are clearly structured and easily identifiable within the tender documents.
3. Clarify the e-procurement process, specifically whether electronic submission is supported, and resolve any contradictions in the tender information.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline