Independent Connection Provider

This tender, currently an Expression of Interest (EOI) in the planning stage, provides a clear project description but suffers from significant data inconsistencies, particularly regarding contract duration, and lacks crucial details such as evaluation criteria.

As an Expression of Interest, the tender is generally compliant for market engagement. However, the 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' fields are vague, and the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds, even for future stages, is a minor legal gap. CPV codes are correctly assigned, and no disputes are present.

The project description and technical requirements are clearly articulated, making the scope of work understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria for the EOI or subsequent tender significantly reduces clarity, leaving potential suppliers uncertain about selection factors.

Basic information like title, organization, reference, estimated value, and location are provided. However, there is a critical inconsistency between the stated 'Contract Duration: 5 months' and the project timeline described as 'July 2026' to 'early November 2027' (16 months). The lack of evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.

The estimated value is disclosed, and document access appears adequate for an EOI. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, hindering fair competition. Submission via email rather than a dedicated e-procurement platform also presents a minor fairness concern. Requirements for Lloyds registered NERS accredited ICPs are specific but likely legitimate for this specialized work, not appearing tailored to a single company.

The contract start date and financing information are available. However, the significant discrepancy in contract duration makes practical planning and resource allocation extremely difficult for potential bidders. The reliance on email for submission is less practical than a modern e-procurement system.

The most critical issue is the severe inconsistency between the stated 'Contract Duration: 5 months' and the project completion timeline of 16 months. Minor inconsistencies include empty 'Liable Person' and 'Type/Procedure: None' fields.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.