Renovation works of the sports complex at Piliuonos Gymnasium, Kaunas district

This tender clearly outlines the scope of works and uses e-procurement, but its quality is significantly hampered by the lack of disclosed estimated value and, critically, the absence of evaluation criteria in the summary, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender defines the procedure type (Open, referencing EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and uses an appropriate CPV code. No disputes or suspensions are reported. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, the tender reveal date is missing, and evaluation criteria are not specified in the summary, which are disclosure issues.

The description of the works is clear and further detailed in the contract notice. While high-level requirements are extracted, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria in the summary significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how offers will be judged.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration, is provided. All tender documents are listed and some are summarized. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing from the summary, which are notable gaps in the overall completeness of the tender overview.

Full document access and e-procurement support contribute positively to fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value can disadvantage some bidders, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria in the summary severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and compliant offers.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. The duration of the contract is specified. However, the contract start date is not known, and detailed financing information is not available, which are minor practical drawbacks.

The tender shows good consistency regarding dates (submission/opening) and the absence of disputes/suspensions. However, several key fields such as 'Liable Person', 'Estimated Value', and the 'Reveal Date' are not populated or disclosed, indicating data gaps.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also noted as not being EU funded. This represents a missed opportunity to incorporate modern sustainability and social responsibility criteria.