Tenders

Information portal maintenance and development

Open
Deadline
21 days left
March 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6504564
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 24, 2026

Tender Opening

March 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
64
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€414,969
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
1,352 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

36 months of procurement for the NMA Agricultural Support Administration Information System (ŽŪPAIS)
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not fall under any mandatory exclusion grounds as per applicable public procurement law.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos_portalas.docx

This document outlines the general terms, qualification requirements, and submission procedures for the open competition to procure information portal support and development services for the National Paying Agency.

Sutarties projektas ir techninė specifikacijaDOC
Sutarties projektas ir techninė specifikacija...

This document outlines the general terms and definitions for the contract regarding information portal support and development services, including key concepts like services, buyer, contract value, and acceptance procedures.

EBVPDPDF
espd-request.pdf

This European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is a mandatory self-declaration form for bidders to confirm they meet the tender's exclusion and selection criteria, providing essential company and qualification details.

NoticePDF
Notice_6504564.pdf

This tender notice from the National Paying Agency under the Ministry of Agriculture invites bids for 36 months of support and development services for their agricultural support administration information system (ŽŪPAIS) portal, with full tender documents available online.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for IT support and development services is generally well-structured with key documents available, but suffers from significant transparency issues due to the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type (Open, EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and CPV codes. Mandatory exclusion grounds and the requirement for ESPD ensure basic legal compliance. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value, while not always a legal breach, reduces transparency.

Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity60/100

While the overall scope and duration are clear, and key documents like the contract draft and technical specifications are provided, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency. This significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Basic information, duration, and location are provided, and all essential documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete regarding the estimated value and, more importantly, lacks defined evaluation criteria, which are crucial for a comprehensive tender package.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness50/100

The tender benefits from e-procurement capabilities and full document access. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the critical absence of objective evaluation criteria severely undermine the fairness and transparency of the competition, making it difficult for all bidders to compete equally.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality70/100

Electronic submission is indicated, and the contract duration is clear. However, the lack of a specified contract start date and the undisclosed estimated value reduce the practicality for potential bidders in planning and resource allocation.

Contract start date not known
Financing information (estimated value) not available
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The main inconsistency is the empty 'Liable Person' field and the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag.

'Liable Person' field empty
Contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. automated check result)
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices.

No green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus

Strengths

E-procurement enabled
Clear procedure type and CPV
All key documents attached
Duration clearly specified

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria (critical)
Estimated value not disclosed
No sustainability considerations
Empty 'Liable Person' field

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair assessment.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and aid bidder planning.
3. Integrate sustainability and social responsibility clauses to promote broader public policy objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline