Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login10 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
This document is Part A of the proposal form required for submitting your bid to develop the internal exhibition concept and project for the Kretinga Museum.
This document is Part B of the proposal form, required for bidders to detail their proposed concept and project for the interior exhibition of Kretinga Museum.
This document outlines the qualification criteria for suppliers, requiring at least one museum or exhibition design project worth over 50,000 EUR within the last three years, and specifies how to prove experience and service quality.
This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the service purchase-sale agreement, including key definitions and contract interpretation, which will apply upon winning the tender.
This document details the methodology for evaluating tender proposals, outlining how the economically most advantageous offer will be determined based on price and quality criteria, including specific scoring formulas and expert evaluation methods.
This document outlines the special conditions and template for the service purchase-sale agreement for the Kretinga Museum's internal exhibition concept, project creation, and author's supervision services, detailing the contracting parties.
This document provides the contracting authority's clarifications on personnel experience requirements, stating that a 2-year experience period has no time limit while other specific roles have a 3-year look-back, and confirms that previous project proposals can be re-submitted with confidentiality ensured.
This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form, which bidders must complete to declare their eligibility and compliance with the tender's qualification and exclusion criteria.
This document informs bidders that a complaint was partially satisfied and the deadline for submitting proposals for the Kretinga Museum interior exhibition concept tender has been extended to March 3, 2026.
This notice announces an open tender for interior design services, including concept creation, project development, and author supervision for the Kretinga Museum's internal exhibition, with an estimated value of 161,936 EUR.
This document provides the second-floor plan of the Kretinga Museum, essential for bidders to understand the physical space for the interior exhibition concept and design project.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender demonstrates good quality with comprehensive documentation, clear requirements, and transparent evaluation criteria, supported by EU funding and e-procurement. However, minor inconsistencies in dispute reporting and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria are noted.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and uses appropriate CPV codes. The use of ESPD and mention of mandatory exclusion grounds indicate compliance with EU/national regulations. However, the reveal date is missing, preventing a full assessment of the minimum legal period between publication and submission. Furthermore, Document 4 mentions a partially satisfied complaint, which contradicts the 'Disputes Count: 0' in the statistics, indicating a past legal challenge.
The tender description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements, including eligibility, technical, and financial, are well-documented and understandable, further clarified by Document 12. Crucially, Document 10 explicitly details the evaluation criteria, methodology, scoring formulas, and expert evaluation methods, directly contradicting the automated check's 'No evaluation criteria specified' flag.
All basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and contract duration, is provided. A comprehensive set of 13 documents is attached, covering proposal forms, general and special contract conditions, qualification requirements, and evaluation criteria. Location information (NUTS code) is also present.
The tender ensures full document access and transparently discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criteria are clearly defined in Document 10, promoting objectivity. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access for bidders (contradicting the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag). The requirement for specific museum/exhibition experience (Doc 8) is reasonable for the project's nature and value, not appearing tailored to a specific company. The extension of the submission deadline due to a complaint (Doc 4) demonstrates responsiveness and commitment to fairness.
Electronic submission is supported via E-Procurement. The contract duration and financing information (EU Funded) are clearly specified. While a specific contract start date is not provided, this is common in procurement. Document URLs are not explicitly listed but are implied by the availability of documents within an e-procurement system.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant inconsistency regarding disputes: Document 4 explicitly states a complaint was partially satisfied, while the 'Disputes Count' in the statistics section is reported as '0'. This discrepancy undermines the reliability of the tender's administrative data.
The tender is identified as EU Funded, which generally implies higher standards. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required