Retour aux appels d'offres

Création du concept d'exposition intérieure du musée de Kretinga, création du projet et projet

Fermé
Date limite
0 jours restants
Mars 03, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
6437700
Valeur
€161,936
Lieu
Klaipeda County, Lituanie
Publié
Février 23, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 12, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 24, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 03, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 03, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€161,936
Durée
8 mois
Lieu
Klaipeda County
Type
Autre
81
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€694,267
Offres moyennes
2.6
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
89%
942 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'autorité contractante a l'intention d'acquérir la préparation du concept de l'exposition intérieure du musée de Kretinga.
Achats écologiquesFinancement UE

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

10 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (3)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (2)
Technique (3)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-03 14:00:00.
--The bid must address the scope of services: Kretinga Museum interior exhibition concept development and project creation.
--All submitted documents must comply with the format and language requirements specified in the full tender documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per national and EU public procurement law (e.g., bankruptcy, grave professional misconduct, criminal convictions, unpaid taxes/social security contributions). Specific details would be outlined in the full tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally established and registered to perform the services in their country of origin.
--Bidders must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract. Specific details would be outlined in the full tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Demonstrate experience in interior design, museum exhibition concept development, or similar cultural heritage projects.
--Possess qualified personnel (e.g., architects, designers, museologists, project managers) with relevant experience for the project scope.
--Ability to complete the concept development and project creation within the 8-month contract duration.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Demonstrate sufficient financial and economic standing to successfully execute a contract with an estimated value of 161,936.0 EUR. Specific financial thresholds or indicators (e.g., minimum annual turnover, financial ratios) would be detailed in the full tender documents.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

11 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Pasiūlymo forma A dalisDOC
6_priedas pasiūlymo forma A dalis (1).doc

This document is Part A of the proposal form required for submitting your bid to develop the internal exhibition concept and project for the Kretinga Museum.

Pasiūlymo forma B dalisDOC
6_priedas pasiūlymo forma B dalis.doc

This document is Part B of the proposal form, required for bidders to detail their proposed concept and project for the interior exhibition of Kretinga Museum.

Kvalifikacijos reikalavimaiDOC
4_priedas Kvalifikacijos reikalavimai (3) (1)...

This document outlines the qualification criteria for suppliers, requiring at least one museum or exhibition design project worth over 50,000 EUR within the last three years, and specifies how to prove experience and service quality.

Paslaugų prikimo-pardavimo sutarties bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Bendrosios sąlygos nuo 2025_05_01 (6).docx

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the service purchase-sale agreement, including key definitions and contract interpretation, which will apply upon winning the tender.

Pasiūlymo vertinimo kriterijai ir sąlygosDOC
Pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijai ir sąlygos1 (2...

This document details the methodology for evaluating tender proposals, outlining how the economically most advantageous offer will be determined based on price and quality criteria, including specific scoring formulas and expert evaluation methods.

Paslaugų pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties specialiosios sąlygosDOC
Specialiosios sutarties sąlygos muziejus(reda...

This document outlines the special conditions and template for the service purchase-sale agreement for the Kretinga Museum's internal exhibition concept, project creation, and author's supervision services, detailing the contracting parties.

Dėl informacijos pateikimoPDF
Atsakymas.pdf

This document provides the contracting authority's clarifications on personnel experience requirements, stating that a 2-year experience period has no time limit while other specific roles have a 3-year look-back, and confirms that previous project proposals can be re-submitted with confidentiality ensured.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.4 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form, which bidders must complete to declare their eligibility and compliance with the tender's qualification and exclusion criteria.

Dėl informacijos pateikimoPDF
inform.tiekejams.pdf

This document informs bidders that a complaint was partially satisfied and the deadline for submitting proposals for the Kretinga Museum interior exhibition concept tender has been extended to March 3, 2026.

NoticePDF
Notice_6437700.pdf

This notice announces an open tender for interior design services, including concept creation, project development, and author supervision for the Kretinga Museum's internal exhibition, with an estimated value of 161,936 EUR.

II aukšto planasPDF
Rūmų II aukštas.pdf

This document provides the second-floor plan of the Kretinga Museum, essential for bidders to understand the physical space for the interior exhibition concept and design project.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

81
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender demonstrates good quality with comprehensive documentation, clear requirements, and transparent evaluation criteria, supported by EU funding and e-procurement. However, minor inconsistencies in dispute reporting and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria are noted.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and uses appropriate CPV codes. The use of ESPD and mention of mandatory exclusion grounds indicate compliance with EU/national regulations. However, the reveal date is missing, preventing a full assessment of the minimum legal period between publication and submission. Furthermore, Document 4 mentions a partially satisfied complaint, which contradicts the 'Disputes Count: 0' in the statistics, indicating a past legal challenge.

Missing tender reveal date
Inconsistency in dispute reporting (Document 4 vs. Statistics)
Clarté90/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements, including eligibility, technical, and financial, are well-documented and understandable, further clarified by Document 12. Crucially, Document 10 explicitly details the evaluation criteria, methodology, scoring formulas, and expert evaluation methods, directly contradicting the automated check's 'No evaluation criteria specified' flag.

Exhaustivité95/100

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and contract duration, is provided. A comprehensive set of 13 documents is attached, covering proposal forms, general and special contract conditions, qualification requirements, and evaluation criteria. Location information (NUTS code) is also present.

Équité90/100

The tender ensures full document access and transparently discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criteria are clearly defined in Document 10, promoting objectivity. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access for bidders (contradicting the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag). The requirement for specific museum/exhibition experience (Doc 8) is reasonable for the project's nature and value, not appearing tailored to a specific company. The extension of the submission deadline due to a complaint (Doc 4) demonstrates responsiveness and commitment to fairness.

Aspect pratique80/100

Electronic submission is supported via E-Procurement. The contract duration and financing information (EU Funded) are clearly specified. While a specific contract start date is not provided, this is common in procurement. Document URLs are not explicitly listed but are implied by the availability of documents within an e-procurement system.

Contract start date not specified
Cohérence des données60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant inconsistency regarding disputes: Document 4 explicitly states a complaint was partially satisfied, while the 'Disputes Count' in the statistics section is reported as '0'. This discrepancy undermines the reliability of the tender's administrative data.

Contradiction between 'Disputes Count: 0' and Document 4 mentioning a satisfied complaint
Durabilité50/100

The tender is identified as EU Funded, which generally implies higher standards. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social aspects criteria

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation, including detailed evaluation criteria and contract conditions.
Clear and well-defined requirements for bidders and the scope of services.
High transparency with disclosed estimated value, EU funding, and objective evaluation methodology.
Utilizes E-Procurement and ESPD, aligning with modern and EU procurement standards.
Contracting authority demonstrated responsiveness by extending the deadline and clarifying requirements.

Préoccupations

Inconsistency in dispute reporting, with a past complaint mentioned but not reflected in statistics.
Missing tender reveal date, which hinders full legal compliance assessment of initial publication period.
Lack of explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.
Automated check results contained inaccuracies regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission.

Recommandations

1. Ensure all dispute information is accurately reflected in the tender statistics to maintain full transparency and data consistency.
2. Clearly state the tender publication/reveal date in the basic information to allow for complete legal compliance checks.
3. Consider integrating explicit sustainability (green, social) and innovation criteria into future tenders, especially for EU-funded projects.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline