7 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
8 documents available with AI summaries
This document is a mandatory proposal form to be completed and submitted for the tender of patient and fluid warming equipment and vaccine refrigerators for the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital Kaunas Clinics.
This mandatory declaration form requires suppliers to detail and confirm the qualifications and compliance of their responsible personnel for the medical heating and vaccine refrigeration equipment tender.
This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and conditions for the supply of patient and fluid warming equipment, along with vaccine refrigerators, to the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital Kaunas Clinics.
This document outlines the detailed technical specifications for patient and fluid warming equipment, as well as vaccine refrigerators, required for the tender.
This document is a supplier's declaration confirming compliance or non-compliance with specific regulatory provisions, essential for tender submission.
This document outlines the general terms and conditions of the goods purchase-sale contract for patient and fluid warming equipment and vaccine refrigerators.
This document outlines the general requirements and conditions for participating in the tender for patient/fluid warming equipment and vaccine refrigerators.
This contract notice announces an open tender by Kaunas Clinics for patient and fluid warming equipment and vaccine refrigerators, partly funded by the EU, with submissions required electronically.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for medical equipment is procedurally sound with EU funding and comprehensive documents, but suffers from critical transparency issues due to an undisclosed estimated value and missing evaluation criteria. The AI summary's failure to extract key requirements from available documents is also a notable concern.
The tender defines an open procedure referencing EU directive 2014/24/ES and includes an ESPD, indicating an intent for compliance. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant breach of transparency requirements. The CPV code is too narrow for the scope, and evaluation criteria are not specified, posing legal risks. The missing reveal date also hinders full assessment of deadline reasonableness.
The overall description of the goods is clear. While the AI summary states that many requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are 'Not specified', the presence of documents like 'BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAI AK.docx', '4 Priedas Techninė specifikacija.docx', and '5 Priedas EBVPD.zip' suggests these details are available to bidders. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, making it difficult for bidders to formulate optimal proposals.
The tender provides most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration. A comprehensive set of 11 documents is attached, which likely contain detailed requirements. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and evaluation criteria are explicitly missing, representing significant gaps in completeness.
Full document access, E-Procurement, and the division into parts enhance fairness by promoting wider participation. Nevertheless, the undisclosed estimated value and the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot properly assess the opportunity or understand how their bids will be judged. The missing reveal date also impacts the ability to confirm reasonable preparation time.
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration and funding source (EU Funded) are clearly specified. The lack of a specific contract start date is a minor detail, but overall, the tender appears practical for bidders to engage with.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The status is active with no disputes. There are some inconsistencies in the automated check results (e.g., 'No e-submission' contradicting 'E-Procurement', 'Tender suspended' contradicting 'Status: active'), but these appear to be issues with the automated analysis rather than the primary tender data itself. The main inconsistency is the missing estimated value.
The tender is EU Funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards. However, there are no explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its contribution to broader sustainability goals.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Loading competitor predictions...
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required