Tenders

Theory Test Services

Open
Deadline
19 days left
March 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
015156-2026
Value
£700,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 23, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 04, 2028

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
View Original
Budget
£700,000,000
Duration
84 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA), an executive agency of the Department for Transport (DfT), will be completing some Early Market Engagement (EME) for the Theory Test Services reprocurement. The UK Theory Test is a statutory service owned by the DVSA that is the prerequisite in the driving learner journey to taking the practical test. The Test is made up of two test elements, the Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ) and Hazard Perception Test (HPT). It is the largest e-assessment in the UK, undertaking at present approximately 3.6 million tests per annum. The service contains 16 different types of Theory Test, including: Car, Motorcycle, Large Goods Vehicles, Passenger Carrying Vehicles, Certificate of Professional Competence, Approved Driving Instructor (ADI), Enhance Rider Scheme, Examiner Car. Encompassed further within this are the additional testing types within the Northern Ireland Driver and Vehicle Agency (DVA) service, which are Taxi, ADI and Approved Motorcycle Instructor tests.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements for a formal tender are detailed in this Early Market Engagement description. Any submissions would be related to the EME process, which is not specified.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in this Early Market Engagement description.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Must be capable of providing e-learning services (CPV 80420000).
--Must be capable of delivering comprehensive Theory Test Services for the UK driving learner journey.
--Must be able to manage and deliver a statutory e-assessment service.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Demonstrated expertise in large-scale e-assessment design and delivery.
--Proven technical infrastructure and operational capacity to manage approximately 3.6 million tests annually.
--Ability to develop and maintain diverse e-assessment content for 16 distinct test types and additional DVA tests.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Must demonstrate sufficient financial capacity to deliver a contract with an estimated value of 700,000,000.0 EUR over an 84-month duration.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This is a clear Early Market Engagement (EME) notice for a significant public service, effectively communicating the scope and desired capabilities. However, the absence of accessible market engagement documents and details on how to participate in the EME process limits its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

As an Early Market Engagement (EME) notice, the tender appears legally compliant in terms of transparency for market engagement. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. The lack of a formal procedure type and code is inherent to the EME stage.

•Formal procedure type and code are not specified, which is typical for an EME notice but would be a concern for a formal tender.
Clarity90/100

The description is very clear about its purpose as an Early Market Engagement and the comprehensive scope of the future 'Theory Test Services'. The AI-extracted requirements are high-level and understandable, which is appropriate for this pre-procurement stage.

Completeness60/100

While basic information, estimated value, duration, and deadlines are provided, a significant gap is the absence of content for the listed tender documents. Even for an EME, some form of RFI or market engagement brief would typically be accessible.

•No content available for the listed tender documents, hindering comprehensive understanding for potential participants.
Fairness65/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are generic and functional, not appearing tailored to a specific company. Deadlines are reasonable for an EME response. However, the lack of accessible document content reduces transparency and equal access to information for all potential suppliers.

•Lack of accessible content for the listed documents limits full transparency and equal access to information.
Practicality55/100

The contract start date, duration, and estimated value are known. However, there is no clear information on how to engage with the EME, such as the method for submitting responses or where to find any associated EME documents, which impacts practicality for interested parties.

•No clear instructions on how to participate in the Early Market Engagement process (e.g., submission method, access to EME-specific documents).
Data Consistency95/100

All provided data points are consistent with each other and with the tender's status as an Early Market Engagement notice. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions.

Sustainability20/100

The tender notice makes no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•Absence of any explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of the service and its purpose as Early Market Engagement.
High-level requirements are well-defined and appropriate for the EME stage.
Transparency regarding estimated value, contract duration, and future start date.
Appropriate CPV classification.
Requirements are generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Concerns

Lack of accessible content for the listed tender documents, even for EME.
Absence of specific instructions on how to engage with the EME process (e.g., submission method).
No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Formal procedure type and code are missing, though acceptable for EME.
No evaluation criteria, which is expected for EME but would be a major concern for a formal tender.

Recommendations

1. Publish any relevant Early Market Engagement documents (e.g., RFI, market brief) to facilitate informed market participation.
2. Clearly outline the process and methods for interested parties to respond to the EME.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, and innovation criteria into future procurement stages.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline