Legal Compliance65/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly. However, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that mandatory exclusion grounds are not mentioned in the provided text, and evaluation criteria are missing. These are fundamental for legal compliance.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Clarity70/100
The description of the services for both Lot 1 and Lot 2 is clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are well-defined. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and submission requirements significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
•Missing explicit financial requirements.
Completeness65/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are provided. Documents are also listed. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and specific submission instructions.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
•Missing explicit financial requirements.
Fairness60/100
The tender discloses the estimated value and provides document access. The requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely impacts transparency and objectivity, and the lack of e-submission creates an unequal playing field for modern bidders.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
•No e-submission functionality.
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in contemporary procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.
•No e-submission functionality.
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and 'Procedure Code' are unpopulated but do not affect overall data consistency significantly.
•Liable Person field is empty.
•Procedure Code field is empty.
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.