Tree felling and pruning services

This tender is generally well-structured and clear, but restricted document access and a lack of sustainability considerations are significant concerns that impact its overall quality and fairness.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, uses an appropriate CPV code, and has a reasonable submission period. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a notable issue that could hinder compliance with transparency requirements.

The tender's description, procedure type, and evaluation criteria ('lowest price') are clearly stated. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable, indicating good clarity in the core documentation.

Basic information, financial details, and timelines are well-populated. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly compromises the completeness of the tender for potential bidders.

The tender value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria are objective. E-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw that severely undermines fairness by preventing all bidders from accessing essential information.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a positive aspect for practicality. The duration is specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' makes it impractical for bidders, and the contract start date is not explicitly known.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. Contradictions identified by automated checks regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria were reconciled by prioritizing explicit tender characteristics and document summaries, leading to a high level of internal consistency.

The tender lacks any explicit mention or integration of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.