Legal Compliance100/100
Legal compliance is questionable due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and specific eligibility requirements for bidders, which are fundamental in public procurement directives and national laws.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing specific eligibility requirements for bidders
Clarity40/100
While insurer credit rating requirements are clearly stated, the overall clarity is poor due to the absence of detailed service specifications, evaluation criteria, and comprehensive tender documents. The 'sole discretion' clause for lower-rated insurers, though explained, could benefit from further transparency regarding its application.
•Lack of detailed service scope for 'Insurance and Related Services'
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete, as no documents are attached, and essential information such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing. This makes it impossible for bidders to prepare comprehensive and compliant proposals.
•No tender documents attached or content available
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100
The absence of evaluation criteria is a significant fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be assessed, leading to an unlevel playing field. While high insurer rating requirements are common for such services, the overall lack of transparency due to missing documents could disadvantage potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Potential for unfair assessment due to lack of transparent process details
Practicality40/100
It is impractical for potential bidders to formulate comprehensive and accurate proposals without detailed service specifications, terms, and evaluation criteria. The process for lower-rated insurers, while providing flexibility, adds complexity for bidders requiring pre-bid deadline disclosures and acceptance.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare comprehensive bids due to missing information
Data Consistency100/100
Based on the limited information provided, the internal requirements regarding insurer ratings and the process for lower-rated insurers appear consistent.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or innovation aspects, representing a missed opportunity for sustainable and responsible procurement.
•No sustainability criteria
•No social criteria