Independent Travel Training

This tender for Independent Travel Training services provides a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in completeness, clarity, and fairness, primarily due to missing evaluation criteria and the inclusion of an irrelevant document.

Legal compliance is moderate. The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined, and no disputes are flagged. However, the presence of an irrelevant document (Document 3) within the tender package raises concerns about the integrity of the procurement process, and the AI-extracted requirements note a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds.

Clarity is notably deficient. While the service description is clear and the AI-extracted requirements are understandable, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a major concern, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed. Performance conditions are implied but not explicitly detailed.

Completeness is significantly impacted. While basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, the inclusion of an entirely irrelevant document (Document 3) suggests a critical failure in document management, potentially indicating missing relevant tender documents. Furthermore, evaluation criteria are explicitly absent, and mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed.

Fairness is compromised. The explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a major transparency issue, hindering equal opportunity for bidders. The automated check also indicates no e-submission support, which limits equal access. While requirements do not appear tailored, these fundamental gaps reduce the overall fairness score.

Practicality is moderate. The lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the need to express interest for full document access and the absence of a direct document URL also slightly reduce practicality.

Data consistency is poor. The most critical issue is the inclusion of Document 3, which is completely unrelated to the tender, indicating a severe data management error. Additionally, there is a currency inconsistency where the estimated value is listed as EUR in one section and GBP in the description.

Sustainability aspects are moderate. The service itself inherently addresses a significant social need by supporting individuals with disabilities and learning needs. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement, social clauses for suppliers, or innovation criteria, as confirmed by automated checks.