Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a DPS and the focus on social and sustainability criteria align with modern public procurement principles. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed legal requirements in the provided extract is a significant concern regarding full legal compliance and transparency.
•Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Lack of detailed legal requirements for suppliers (e.g., specific declarations, certifications).
Clarity40/100
The overarching objectives of the DPS, particularly regarding ethical practices, sustainability, and social value themes, are clearly articulated. Nevertheless, the practical 'how-to' for suppliers to demonstrate compliance and the specific evidence required for each criterion remain undefined, leading to ambiguity.
•Lack of specific details on how suppliers should demonstrate compliance with ethical, sustainable, and social value requirements.
•Undefined 'Service Category,' 'Geographical Location,' and 'Additional Capabilities' for application.
Completeness83/100
This is the tender's weakest aspect. The complete absence of actual tender documents (e.g., specifications, terms and conditions, full instructions) renders the provided information fundamentally incomplete for any supplier to prepare a compliant and informed application. Key financial requirements are also missing.
•Complete absence of actual tender documents.
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria for both selection and subsequent call-off awards.
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure, designed for openness and SME support, inherently promotes fairness. However, the lack of clear, objective evaluation criteria and detailed requirements could lead to subjective assessments, potentially undermining the principle of equal treatment among applicants.
•Absence of explicit, objective evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessment of applications.
•Lack of detailed requirements might disadvantage suppliers unfamiliar with the specific expectations of the contracting authority.
Practicality40/100
While the strategic intent of the DPS is practical for achieving procurement goals, the practicality for suppliers is severely hampered. Without detailed instructions on how to demonstrate broad qualitative requirements (e.g., 'ability to support local SMEs'), preparing a compliant and competitive application becomes highly challenging.
•Suppliers face significant practical challenges in preparing a compliant application due to the lack of detailed instructions and evaluation criteria.
•The broad and qualitative nature of some requirements without specific metrics or evidence types makes practical application difficult.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent. The title, description, and characteristics align well with the stated goals of ethical, sustainable, and social value procurement, and the roles of the organization and its subsidiary are clear.
Sustainability25/100
Sustainability and social value are central to this tender, explicitly driving its design and objectives. The comprehensive themes for social value and the focus on environmental impact reduction are strong positive aspects, aligning with best practices in sustainable procurement.