Transport for Greater Manchester E-Scooter Trial

This tender, described as preliminary market engagement, provides a clear context for e-scooter trials but suffers from significant gaps in formal procedure definition, evaluation criteria, and potentially restrictive eligibility requirements.

The tender is in 'planning' status and explicitly for 'preliminary market engagement,' which mitigates some formal legal compliance requirements. However, the 'Type: None' and 'Procedure: None' fields are unpopulated, which is poor practice even for market engagement. The CoMoUK accreditation requirement, while potentially ensuring quality, could be seen as restrictive.

The description of the project, its context within the Bee Network, and the purpose of the market engagement are very clear and detailed. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential respondents.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are well-defined. Documents are available. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the undefined formal procedure type are notable gaps.

Fairness is significantly impacted by the complete lack of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque. The mandatory CoMoUK accreditation requirement, while potentially ensuring quality, is highly specific and could unduly restrict competition, potentially favoring existing market players. The absence of electronic submission also hinders equal access.

The tender provides clear contract start and duration details. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for respondents.

Most key fields are populated and consistent, including dates and financial information. The primary inconsistency lies in the unpopulated 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields, which contradict the detailed description of preliminary market engagement.

The tender description explicitly mentions demonstrating 'innovation or learning opportunities' and exploring 'future opportunities for micromobility,' indicating a focus on innovation. However, there are no explicit criteria or mentions of green procurement or social aspects.