Development of primary healthcare infrastructure in Talsi municipality

This tender for primary healthcare infrastructure development in Talsi municipality demonstrates good foundational information but is significantly hampered by critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, undisclosed estimated value, and restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and the deadlines are reasonable. There are no reported disputes. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the undisclosed estimated value raise concerns regarding full transparency and compliance with disclosure requirements, despite the tender being EU funded.

The project description is clear, and requirements are well-categorized, referencing detailed documents for specifics. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the clarity for potential bidders on how their offers will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location details are provided. All listed documents are processed. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and, more critically, the absence of defined evaluation criteria.

Fairness is severely compromised by the restricted document access and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and compliant offers. The undisclosed estimated value further hinders fair competition. The contradiction regarding e-procurement/e-submission also raises questions about equal access.

The tender specifies a contract duration and is EU funded. However, the practicality is reduced by the contradiction regarding e-submission support and the 'Restricted document access,' which creates hurdles for bidders. The absence of a specific contract start date is a minor practical inconvenience.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding e-procurement and e-submission capabilities, and the missing estimated value.

Despite being EU funded, the tender explicitly lacks any specified green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the project.