Legal Compliance75/100
The tender is in 'planning' status, indicating preliminary market engagement. While CPV codes are assigned and no disputes exist, the absence of a defined procedure type and formal submission method would be a significant legal gap for a full tender. For a PME, it's acceptable but highlights future needs.
•Procedure type not clearly defined
•Formal submission method (e-procurement) not specified, relies on email contact
Clarity80/100
The technical requirements for sample tubes and de-capping equipment are very clear and specific. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders in a future formal tender.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements mentioned but not detailed
Completeness70/100
Basic information like organization, reference, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. However, crucial elements for a full tender, such as a descriptive title, liable person, detailed eligibility, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria, are missing.
•Missing descriptive tender title (Title: Jo Murphy)
•Missing liable person
Fairness65/100
The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents bidders from understanding how their proposals will be judged. The absence of an e-procurement platform for expressing interest (relying on email) also limits equal access and transparency. Technical requirements are specific but not overtly tailored.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
•No e-procurement enabled for equal access (email contact only)
Practicality65/100
The tender relies on email for expressing interest, which is not an electronic submission system. No direct document URL is provided beyond the summaries. While contract duration and start date are clear, the overall process lacks modern e-procurement practicality.
•Electronic submission is not supported (email contact only)
•No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are 'None', and the 'Liable Person' is missing. The title 'Jo Murphy' is also inconsistent with a standard tender title, indicating data quality issues.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' definitions
•Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability30/100
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender documentation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability considerations into the procurement process.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social aspects included