Framework Agreement for Road Restraints Systems Maintenance

This tender presents a clear basic structure but suffers from significant gaps in critical information, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria, which severely impacts clarity and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no reported disputes. While the reveal date is missing, the submission period from today is reasonable. However, the summary's reliance on an external portal for mandatory exclusion grounds and specific financial requirements means the provided documentation is not fully self-contained for legal review.

The description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. Additionally, key financial and legal requirements are only referenced externally.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location are well-provided. All listed documents are attached and summarized. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the lack of full detail for mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements within the provided documents.

Full document access via the eTenderWales portal, disclosed value, and reasonable submission deadlines contribute positively to fairness. Electronic submission is supported. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and objectivity, making it challenging for bidders to compete fairly. The 'single contractor' framework, while permissible, limits competition.

The tender supports electronic submission via the eTenderWales portal, provides clear instructions for document access, and specifies the contract start date and duration. Estimated financing information is also available, making the process practical for potential bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, along with a slight discrepancy in the estimated value between EUR and GBP figures.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.