Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly states compliance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, specifically Regulation 34 for DPS. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, which is standard practice. However, the lack of full tender documents and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to fully verify adherence to all legal requirements for transparency and equal treatment.
•Absence of full tender documents prevents verification of complete legal compliance.
•Missing specific evaluation criteria, which are legally required for transparent procurement.
Clarity40/100
The tender's purpose, the procuring entity, and the general scope (fuel for new build projects in London and South East) are clearly stated. However, many requirements are vague and lack specific definitions or measurable standards, such as 'qualified fuel supplier' or the criteria to become an 'Admitted Supplier'.
•Vague definitions for key requirements (e.g., 'qualified fuel supplier', 'technical capability').
•Lack of specific criteria for becoming an 'Admitted Supplier' to the DPS.
Completeness75/100
Basic tender information is provided, including title, reference, organization, type, procedure, status, deadline, duration, and CPV code. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of any attached documents, estimated value, and detailed evaluation criteria.
•Complete absence of any attached tender documents, specifications, or terms and conditions.
•Estimated contract value is not disclosed, hindering commercial assessment by suppliers.
Fairness40/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System inherently promotes fairness by allowing new suppliers to join throughout its validity. However, the lack of detailed and objective evaluation criteria, coupled with the absence of tender documents, introduces a risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining the fairness of the admission process.
•Risk of subjective evaluation due to missing detailed and objective assessment criteria.
•Lack of transparency regarding the full application process and requirements could disadvantage some suppliers.
Practicality40/100
Establishing a DPS is a practical approach for ongoing, flexible procurement of common goods like fuel. However, the current state of the tender, with no documents and vague requirements, makes it highly impractical for potential suppliers to prepare a meaningful and compliant submission.
•Suppliers cannot practically prepare a comprehensive application without access to full tender documents and detailed requirements.
•Absence of estimated value makes it difficult for suppliers to gauge the commercial viability and resource commitment required.
Data Consistency100/100
The limited information provided is internally consistent, with the description aligning with the stated DPS procedure and requirements.
Sustainability0/100
There is no mention of green procurement, environmental considerations, or social criteria within the provided tender information. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability aspects into the procurement process.
•No integration of environmental or green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social value considerations.