Capital Investment Research

This tender demonstrates good clarity and fairness with well-defined requirements and evaluation criteria, but is hampered by missing key legal disclosure information and a lack of electronic submission support.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided snippets raises compliance concerns.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-documented and understandable. Evaluation criteria (Quality 70%, Price 20%, Social Value 10%) are clearly specified.

While basic information, value, duration, and documents are provided, the tender lacks a reveal date and explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text. The 'Liable Person' and procedure 'Code' fields are also empty.

The tender offers full document access via a URL, discloses the estimated value, and presents objective and transparent evaluation criteria. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

A document URL and clear contract dates are provided. However, the automated check indicates 'No e-submission,' which is a significant practical drawback for modern procurement processes, despite the use of an e-sourcing platform.

Key dates are logical, and there are no disputes. However, several fields are empty ('Liable Person', 'Type Code', 'Procedure Code'), and the absence of a reveal date is a data gap. The contradiction regarding e-submission is also a consistency issue.

The tender positively includes social aspects, allocating 10% of the evaluation score to Social Value. However, it lacks explicit focus on green procurement or innovation and is not EU funded.